Affiliation:
1. Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USA
Abstract
AbstractIs public policy responsive to demographically and ideologically unrepresentative comments given at public meetings? I investigate this possibility using a novel data set of over 40,000 comments made at the San Francisco Planning Commission between 1998 and 2021, matched to information about proposed developments discussed in hearings and administrative data on commenters. I document four stylized facts: First, commenters at public meetings are unrepresentative of the public along racial, gender, age, and homeownership lines; second, distance to the proposed development predicts commenting behavior, but only among those in opposition; third, commission votes are correlated with commenters’ preferences; finally, the alignment of White commenters (vs. other racial groups) and neighborhood group representatives and the general public (vs. other interest groups) better predict project approvals.
Reference56 articles.
1. Public Meetings and the Democratic Process;Adams Brian.;Public Administration Review,2004
2. Local Interests
3. The Assessment Gap: Racial Inequalities in Property Taxation;Avenancio‐Léon Carlos F.;The Quarterly Journal of Economics,2022
4. Barari Soubhik andTylerSimko.2021. “The Asymmetric Nationalization of Local Politics.”Working Paper.https://soubhikbarari.com/writings/localgov.pdf.