Affiliation:
1. Department of Political Science University of California, Davis Davis California USA
2. Center for Data Science New York University New York New York USA
Abstract
AbstractDoes the implementation of a ranked choice voting (RCV) system increase the number, diversity, and quality of candidates competing in local elections? Using original data from 273 cities across three decades and employing a preregistered difference‐in‐differences design with matching, I find that the size of the candidate pool increases following implementation. However, this effect dissipates in later election cycles, indicating that RCV has no long‐term effect on candidate entry. Indeed, the short‐term increase in the candidate pool mostly reflects increased entry by low‐quality candidates with little chance of winning. Additionally, I find that RCV has no effect on the proportion of female and non‐white candidates running for office. These results call into question several purported benefits of RCV and suggest that RCV, by itself, might not be sufficient to influence candidate entry at the local level.
Reference63 articles.
1. 2018 Municipal Form of Government Survey Report.2018. “Summary of Survey Results.” International City/County Management Association.
2. At‐Large Elections and Minority Representation in Local Government
3. Ackerman S. J.1998. “The Vote That Failed.”Smithsonian Magazine.https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/the‐vote‐that‐failed‐159427766/
4. Gender Stereotyping and the Electoral Success of Women Candidates: New Evidence from Local Elections in the United States
5. How much should we trust staggered difference-in-differences estimates?