Performance validity tests in nonlitigant patients with functional motor disorder

Abstract

AbstractBackground and purposePerformance validity tests (PVTs) are used in neuropsychological assessments to detect patterns of performance suggesting that the broader evaluation may be an invalid reflection of an individual's abilities. Data on functional motor disorder (FMD) are currently poor and conflicting. We aimed to examine the rate of failure on three different PVTs of nonlitigant, non‐compensation‐seeking FMD patients, and we compared their performance to that of healthy controls and controls asked to simulate malingering (healthy simulators).MethodsWe enrolled 29 nonlitigant, non‐compensation‐seeking patients with a clinical diagnosis of FMD, 29 healthy controls, and 29 healthy simulators. Three PVTs, the Coin in the Hand Test (CIH), the Rey 15‐Item Test (REY), and the Finger Tapping Test (FTT), were employed.ResultsFunctional motor disorder patients showed low rates of failure on the CIH and REY (7% and 10%, respectively) and slightly higher rates on the FTT (15%, n = 26), which implies a motor task. Their performance was statistically comparable to that of healthy controls but statistically different from that of healthy simulators (p < 0.001). Ninety‐three percent of FMD patients, 7% of healthy simulators, and 100% of healthy controls passed at least two of the three tests.ConclusionsPerformance validity test performance of nonlitigant, non‐compensation‐seeking patients with FMD ranged from 7% to 15%. Patients' performance was comparable to that of controls and significantly differed from that of simulators. This simple battery of three PVTs could be of practical utility and routinely used in clinical practice.