Affiliation:
1. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services Fort Collins Colorado USA
2. U.S. Geological Survey National Wildlife Health Center Madison Wisconsin USA
3. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services Carlsbad California USA
4. Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine University of California Davis Davis California USA
5. California Department of Fish and Wildlife Wildlife Health Laboratory Rancho Cordova California USA
6. Karen C. Drayer Wildlife Health Center University of California Davis Davis California USA
7. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service San Luis National Wildlife Refuge Complex Los Banos California USA
Abstract
AbstractRabbit hemorrhagic disease virus 2 (RHDV2), recently detected in the western United States, has the potential to cause mass mortality events in wild rabbit and hare populations. Currently, few management strategies exist other than vaccination. We developed a spatially explicit model of RHDV2 for a population of riparian brush rabbits (Sylvilagus bachmani riparius), a subspecies of brush rabbit classified as endangered in the United States, on a subsection of the San Joaquin River National Wildlife Refuge. The goal of our model was to provide guidance regarding vaccination strategies for an endangered rabbit species. Our model predicts that increased interactions between rabbits (a proxy for landscape connectivity) and disease transmission rates among susceptible hosts (individual brush rabbits and conspecifics) have the greatest influence on the outcome of a potential vaccination campaign. Our model projects that across a range of parameter estimates (given an RHDV2 incursion), the median estimated population size with a 0%–10% vaccination rate after 1 year is 538 rabbits (95% Confidence Interval [C.I.] 69–1235), approximately 36% of the expected size of the study population of 1470 rabbits without an RHDV2 introduction. With a 10%–20%, 20%–30%, or 30%–40% vaccination rate, the median estimated population size increased to 628 rabbits (95% C.I. 130–1298), 723 rabbits (95% C.I. 198–1317), and 774 rabbits (95% C.I. 228–1410), respectively. These estimates represent 43%, 49%, and 53% of the expected population size without an RHDV2 introduction. Overall, a 1% increase in vaccination rate was associated with a six rabbit (95% C.I. 5–7) increase in total remaining population size. This result is dependent on assumptions regarding environmental transmission, home range size (and contact rates of rabbits). Given the relatively short lifespan of rabbits and the potential need for boosters, vaccination programs are most likely to be successful for small target populations where relatively high vaccination rates can be maintained.
Subject
Nature and Landscape Conservation,Environmental Science (miscellaneous),Ecology,Global and Planetary Change
Reference57 articles.
1. Rabbit haemorrhagic disease (RHD) and rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus (RHDV): A review;Abrantes J.;Veterinary Research,2012
2. Herd immunity;Ashby B.;Current Biology,2021
3. Outbreak of rabbit hemorrhagic disease virus 2 in the southwestern United States: First detections in southern California;Asin J.;Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation,2021
4. Basey G. E.(1990).Distribution ecology and population status of the riparian brush rabbit (Sylvilagus bachmani riparius). MS Thesis. California State University Stanislaus Turlock.
5. Identifying common decision problem elements for the management of emerging fungal diseases of wildlife;Bernard R. F.;Society & Natural Resources,2019