Affiliation:
1. Institute on Community Integration University of Minnesota Minneapolis USA
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundDeinstitutionalization research shows better services and outcomes relative to institutional life but has not compared formerly institutionalised and never‐institutionalised service users.MethodsWe used propensity score matching (PSM) to match formerly institutionalised and never‐institutionalised participants on six personal characteristics. Data came from the 2018 to 2019 National Core Indicators In‐Person Survey. We excluded current institution residents, and states with 25% + of missing data on former institutionalisation.ResultsOverall, 15.5% of participants in the 29‐state full sample had lived in an institution for 1 year or more. Findings from the PSM sample showed that former‐institution residents were more likely to use congregate living arrangements and less likely to live with family. They experienced more loneliness, less support‐related choice, and had a consistent pattern of disability service‐focused social connections.ConclusionsMany former institution residents remain disadvantaged relative to matched peers. There is a need to identify factors to enhance services and outcomes following deinstitutionalization.
Subject
Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献