Development of a global hospital self-assessment tool and prioritization tier system based on FIP's Basel Statements

Author:

Lyons Kayley12,Blalock Susan J2,Brock Tina Penick3,Manasse Henri R4,Eckel Stephen F25

Affiliation:

1. University of North Carolina (UNC) School of Education, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

2. UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

3. University of Illinois at Chicago College of Pharmacy, Chicago, IL, USA

4. University of California, San Francisco School of Pharmacy, San Francisco, CA, USA

5. Department of Pharmacy, UNC Hospitals, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Abstract

Abstract Objectives The objective of this study was to develop and pilot a hospital self-assessment tool and prioritization system for hospitals to evaluate their pharmacy practice performance against the International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP)'s Basel Statements. Methods To develop the self-assessment tool, we reviewed the Basel statements to identify characteristics that could be measured at the individual hospital level and finalized these based on feedback from five cognitive interviews. The survey instrument was pilot tested in four countries; two high-, one lower middle- and one low-income country. Participants were electronically sent the survey tool and enrolled through the snowball sampling method. Tiers were developed by investigators to assist hospitals in prioritizing the achievement of Basel Statement practices. Tiers were validated by the Hospital Section chairs of FIP through a card sorting exercise. Simple agreement and Cohen's kappa was used to characterize inter-rater reliability. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the responses. Key findings Forty-four survey responses were collected from 36 hospitals in four countries. The survey response rate was 29% and took an average of 26 minutes to complete. The overall average agreement of constructs was 83%. The survey characterized how far a hospital was to achieving the Basel Statement practices with an average achievement rate of 57% (ranging from 30% to 90%). The survey highlighted medication safety challenges facing the pharmacy profession. The results produced a benchmarking report for each respondent. Conclusions The results support the validity and reliability of the survey tool. This comprehensive survey tool can be used by institutions to track their progress towards achieving the Basel Statement practices.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,Pharmaceutical Science,Pharmacy

Reference27 articles.

1. Global conference proceedings – executive summary;Am J Health Syst Pharm,2009

2. Global survey of hospital pharmacy practice;Doloresco;Am J Health Syst Pharm,2009

3. The Basel Statements on the future of hospital pharmacy;Am J Health Syst Pharm,2009

4. The Basel Statements as a stimulus for advancement of hospital pharmacy in a developed country;Zellmer;Int Pharm J,2010

5. The current status of the Basel Statements: Hospital Pharmacists in Ghana;Nordor;Int Pharm J,2010

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3