Affiliation:
1. Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Faculty of Business and Law Queensland University of Technology Brisbane Queensland Australia
2. Faculties of Law and Medicine, Health Law Institute Dalhousie University Halifax Nova Scotia Canada
Abstract
ABSTRACTIntroductionAssisted dying (AD) has been legalised in a small but growing number of jurisdictions globally, including Canada and Australia. Early research in both countries demonstrates that, in response to access barriers, patients and caregivers take action to influence their individual experience of AD, as well as AD systems more widely. This study analyses how patients and caregivers suggest other decision‐makers in AD systems should address identified issues.MethodsWe conducted semistructured, qualitative interviews with patients and caregivers seeking AD in Victoria (Australia) and three Canadian provinces (British Columbia, Ontario and Nova Scotia). Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis and codebook template analysis.ResultsSixty interviews were conducted with 67 participants (65 caregivers, 2 patients). In Victoria, this involved 28 interviews with 33 participants (32 caregivers, 1 patient) about 28 patient experiences. In Canada, this involved 32 interviews with 34 participants (33 caregivers, 1 patient) about 33 patient experiences. We generated six themes, corresponding to six overarching suggestions by patients and caregivers to address identified system issues: (1) improved content and dissemination of information about AD; (2) proactively develop policies and procedures about AD provision; (3) address institutional objection via top‐down action; (4) proactively develop grief resources and peer support mechanisms; (5) amend laws to address legal barriers; and (6) engage with and act on patient and caregiver feedback about experiences.ConclusionAD systems should monitor and respond to suggestions from patients and caregivers with firsthand experience of AD systems, who are uniquely placed to identify issues and suggestions for improvement. To date, Canada has responded comparatively well to address identified issues, whereas the Victorian government has signalled there are no plans to amend laws to address identified access barriers. This may result in patients and caregivers continuing to take on the burdens of acting to address identified issues.Patient or Public ContributionPatients and caregivers are central to this research. We interviewed patients and caregivers about their experiences of AD, and the article focuses on their suggestions for addressing identified barriers within AD systems. Patient interest groups in Australia and Canada also supported our recruitment process.
Funder
Australian Research Council
Reference77 articles.
1. Increased legalisation of medical assistance in dying: relationship to palliative care
2. Bill C‐14 An Act to Amend the Criminal Code and to Make Related Amendments to Other Acts (Medical Assistance in Dying) SC 2016 c.3 https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/annualstatutes/2016_3/fulltext.html.
3. Medical Assistance in Dying: Lessons for Australia from Canada
4. Bill C‐7 An Act to Amend the Criminal Code (Medical Assistance in Dying) SC 2021 c.2 https://www.parl.ca/DocumentViewer/en/43-2/bill/C-7/royal-assent.
5. Voluntary Assisted Dying in Australia: A Comparative and Critical Analysis of State Laws;Waller K.;University of New South Wales Law Journal,2023