Artificial nail modelling systems in healthcare workers: An emerging risk of contact sensitization to a well‐known occupational allergen in an alternative way

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundArtificial nail modelling systems (ANMS) pose a significant risk for nail stylists and their clients regarding acrylate sensitization, which might jeopardize the use of acrylate‐containing medical devices.ObjectivesTo evaluate the frequency of artificial nail practices among female healthcare workers (HCWs) compared with controls and assess ANMS‐related side effects.MethodsIn this comparative, cross‐sectional, single‐centre study, a face‐to‐face interview with 200 female HCWs and 200 age‐matched female dermatology patients (controls) was conducted regarding the use of ANMS between March and November 2023.ResultsAmong 400 participants (median age: 25), 85 (21.3%) have applied ANMS at least once. The prevalence of ANMS application was significantly higher in HCWs (n = 54/200, 27%) compared with controls (n = 31/200, 15.5%) (p < 0.05). Long‐lasting nail polish was the most commonly preferred technique (n = 82/85, 96.5%). ANMS were mainly performed in nail studios by nail stylists (n = 79/85, 92.9%), while three participants were using home kits. Nail brittleness was the most frequently reported side effect (n = 19/85, 22.4%). No case of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) was detected.ConclusionsThe popularity of ANMS among young female HCWs is growing. This striking trend might further put these individuals not only at risk of medical device‐related adverse events but also occupational ACD.