Affiliation:
1. Department of Healthcare Administration Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond Virginia USA
2. Office of the Chief Medical Examiner Washington DC USA
Abstract
AbstractMedical technology has made tremendous strides in extending the lives of patients who have suffered organ failure. Machines can now replace the function of the kidneys, the heart, and other vital organs. Much has been written about a patient's right to refuse or direct the withdrawal of medical treatment, especially at the end of life, under the guise of “death with dignity.” However, little attention has been paid to the situation where a patient elects to deactivate their life‐sustaining medical device without a physician's involvement. This raises the challenging question of whether the patient's manner of death should be classified as suicide or natural. Surprisingly, common law, statutes, medical ethics, and public health practice are not in alignment on the answer. This article will explore the ramifications and far‐reaching impact that such divergence has on the survivors and the medical community, as well as recommend corrective actions and practical approaches for the medical and legal practitioner.
Subject
Genetics,Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Reference36 articles.
1. The Action Alliance. Faith resources: Islam.https://theactionalliance.org/faith‐hope‐life/religion‐specific‐materials/muslim. Accessed 1 Aug 2023.
2. The Action Alliance.Faith resources: Jewish.https://theactionalliance.org/faith‐hope‐life/religion‐specific‐materials/jewish. Accessed 3 June 2022.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献