Commentary on: Hahn M, Anslinger K, Eckert M, Fimmers R, Grethe S, Hohoff C, et al. [Joint recommendations of the project group “Biostatistical <scp>DNA</scp> Calculations” and the Trace Commission on the Biostatistical Evaluation of Forensic <scp>DNA</scp> Analytical Findings with Fully Continuous Models (<scp>FCM</scp>)]. Rechtsmedizin (Berl). 2023; 33(1):3–12. doi: 10.1007/s00194‐022‐00599‐5-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Commentary on: Hahn M, Anslinger K, Eckert M, Fimmers R, Grethe S, Hohoff C, et al. [Joint recommendations of the project group “Biostatistical DNA Calculations” and the Trace Commission on the Biostatistical Evaluation of Forensic DNA Analytical Findings with Fully Continuous Models (FCM)]. Rechtsmedizin (Berl). 2023; 33(1):3–12. doi: 10.1007/s00194‐022‐00599‐5

Published:2023-11-20 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:0022-1198
Container-title:Journal of Forensic Sciences
language:en
Short-container-title:Journal of Forensic Sciences

Author:

Berger Charles E. H.¹²,Kruijver Maarten³,Hicks Tacha⁴⁵,Champod Christophe⁶^ORCID,Taylor Duncan⁷⁸,Buckleton John³⁹

Affiliation:

1. Netherlands Forensic Institute The Hague The Netherlands

2. Institute of Criminal Law and Criminology, Leiden University Leiden The Netherlands

3. Institute of Environmental Science and Research Limited Auckland New Zealand

4. Forensic Genetics Unit, University Center of Legal Medicine, Lausanne—Geneva, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland

5. Fondation pour la Formation Continue Universitaire Lausannoise (UNIL‐EPFL) & School of Criminal Justice Lausanne Switzerland

6. Faculty of Law, Criminal Justice and Public Administration, School of Criminal Justice, University of Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland

7. Forensic Science SA Adelaide South Australia Australia

8. School of Biological Sciences Flinders University Adelaide South Australia Australia

9. Department of Statistics University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Genetics,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1556-4029.15424

Reference16 articles.

1. Examining performance and likelihood ratios for two likelihood ratio systems using the PROVEDIt dataset

2. Quantification of forensic genetic evidence: Comparison of results obtained by qualitative and quantitative software for real casework samples

3. Re: Riman et al. Examining performance and likelihood ratios for two likelihood ratio systems using the PROVEDIt dataset

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. ‘Low’ LRs obtained from DNA mixtures: On calibration and discrimination performance of probabilistic genotyping software;Forensic Science International: Genetics;2024-11