Affiliation:
1. School of Nursing Texas A&M University Health Sciences Center Bryan Texas USA
2. College of Public Health George Mason University Fairfax Virginia USA
3. Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education Oak Ridge Tennessee USA
4. School of Public Health Georgia State University Atlanta Georgia USA
Abstract
AbstractDifficulty visualizing bruises resulting from interpersonal violence, especially in individuals with dark skin, contributes to disparities in access to justice. The purpose of this analysis was to compare bruise visibility of detected injuries using white light versus alternate light sources (ALS). Visibility was assessed using the 5‐point Bruise Visibility Scale (BVS) for white light and the ALS Visibility Scale (AVS) for ALS. Bruises were induced using controlled application of a paintball to the upper arm on 157 healthy adults across six skin color categories. Using a crossover design, the light source used first to assess the bruise (white light or ALS) was randomized. Each bruise was examined up to 21 times over 4 weeks using white light and 10 combinations of wavelengths (350 nanometer [nm] – 535 nm) and colored filters (yellow, orange, and red). Multilevel modeling was used to analyze the repeated measures data with a total 20,103 bruise assessments. Results revealed 415 nm with yellow filter resulted in an almost 0.5‐point increase in BVS/AVS score across all skin colors (Estimate = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.43, 0.49; p < 0.001), a clinically significant improvement in ability to visualize bruises. Conversely, 515 nm (Estimate = −0.80; 95% CI: −0.84, −0.76; p < 0.001) and 535 nm (Estimate = −0.64, 95% CI: −0.67, −0.60; p < 0.001) with red filter resulted in more than 0.5‐point decrease in BVS/AVS score. The use of ALS is supported by the data and results in improved bruise visibility during medical forensic examinations.
Funder
National Institute of Justice
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献