Strategies to detect trace methamphetamine contamination on hard surfaces: Assessing realistic performance of commercially available presumptive tests and a laboratory‐based LC–MS/MS method

Author:

Naviaux William12,Hedman Curtis3,Barkholtz Heather14

Affiliation:

1. Forensic Toxicology Section, Environmental Health Division, Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene Madison Wisconsin USA

2. Pharmacology and Toxicology Program, School of Pharmacy University of Wisconsin‐Madison Madison Wisconsin USA

3. Bureau of Environmental and Occupational Health, Division of Public Health, Wisconsin Department of Health Services Madison Wisconsin USA

4. Pharmaceutical Sciences Division, School of Pharmacy University of Wisconsin‐Madison Madison Wisconsin USA

Abstract

AbstractRecreational methamphetamine production and heavy use can result in dwelling contamination that is difficult to detect. First responders and public health officials may use commercially available trace methamphetamine detection (presumptive) test kits to understand apparent and hidden dangers in impacted dwellings. Here, we assessed the limit of detection (LOD) of several commercially available presumptive test kits using simulated contaminated hard surfaces. Pyrex petri dishes were spiked with aliquots of methanolic methamphetamine solutions to reach desired simulated contamination levels. Commercially available presumptive tests were conducted according to manufacturer instructions and using included sample preparation materials, when available. Additionally, a laboratory‐based liquid chromatography‐triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (LC–MS/MS) trace methamphetamine quantification method was developed and validated using the EZSTATSG2 tool. For the LC–MS/MS method, samples were collected using 2‐ply alcohol prep pads and methamphetamine was extracted using a 1:1 (v:v) methanol: water solution. Most presumptive tests considered were able to detect trace levels of methamphetamine extracted from hard surfaces, with LOD ranging from 0.10–15.00 μg/sample. Comparatively, the laboratory‐based LC–MS/MS LOD was 0.05 μg/sample and limit of quantitation was 0.10 μg/sample. The LC–MS/MS method may be useful when the presence of dust or other contaminants interferes with presumptive test interpretation or reliability. Costs of presumptive tests varied from several dollars to tens of dollars, which is included alongside LOD results to aid stakeholders in identifying which test(s) are the best fit for purpose. Therefore, first responders, public health officials, and other stakeholders have several options for assessing trace methamphetamine contamination.

Funder

Wisconsin Department of Health Services

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3