Independent sector and peri‐operative cardiac arrest as reported to the 7th National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists

Author:

Cook T. M.12ORCID,Kane A. D.34ORCID,Bouch C.5ORCID,Armstrong R. A.46ORCID,Kursumovic E.14ORCID,Soar J.7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust Bath UK

2. School of Medicine University of Bristol Bristol UK

3. Department of Anaesthesia James Cook University Hospital, South Tees NHS Foundation Trust Middlesbrough UK

4. Royal College of Anaesthetists London UK

5. Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care Medicine Leicester Royal Infirmary Leicester UK

6. University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust Bristol UK

7. Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine Southmead Hospital Bristol UK

Abstract

SummaryThe 7th National Audit Project (NAP7) of the Royal College of Anaesthetists studied peri‐operative cardiac arrest including those that occurred in the independent healthcare sector, which provides around 1 in 6 NHS‐funded care episodes. In total, 174 (39%) of 442 independent hospitals contacted agreed to participate. A survey examining provider preparedness for cardiac arrest had a response rate of 23 (13%), preventing useful analysis. An activity survey with 1912 responses (from a maximum of 45% of participating hospitals) showed that, compared with the NHS caseload, the independent sector caseload was less comorbid, with fewer patients at the extremes of age or who were severely obese, and with a large proportion of elective orthopaedic surgery undertaken during weekday working hours. The survey suggested suboptimal compliance rates with monitoring recommendations. Seventeen reports of independent sector peri‐operative cardiac arrest comprised 2% of NAP7 reports and underreporting is likely. These patients were lower risk than NHS cases, reflecting the sector's case mix, but included cases of haemorrhage, anaphylaxis, cardiac arrhythmia and pulmonary embolus. Good and poor quality care were seen, the latter including delayed recognition and treatment of patient deterioration, and poor care delivery. Independent sector outcomes were similar to those in the NHS, though due to the case mix, improved outcomes might be anticipated. Assessment of quality of care was less often favourable for independent sector reports than NHS reports, though assessments were often uncertain, reflecting poor quality reports. Overall, NAP7 is unable to determine whether peri‐operative care relating to cardiac arrest is more, equally or less safe than in the NHS.

Funder

Royal College of Anaesthetists

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Reference21 articles.

1. Private Healthcare Information Network.How does PHIN get data?2021.https://www.phin.org.uk/about/how‐do‐phin‐get‐data(accessed 24/03/2023).

2. Centre for Health and the Public Interest.No Safety Without Liability: Reforming private hospitals in England after the Ian Paterson scandal.2017.https://chpi.org.uk/wp‐content/uploads/2017/10/CHPI‐PatientSafetyPaterson‐Nov29.pdf(accessed 15/03/2023).

3. Health Foundation.Waiting for NHS hospital care: the role of the independent sector.2022.https://www.health.org.uk/publications/long‐reads/waiting‐for‐nhs‐hospital‐care‐the‐role‐of‐the‐independent‐sector(accessed 10/03/2023).

4. LeysC ToftB.Patient Safety in Private Hospitals: The known and unknown risks.2014.https://chpi.org.uk/papers/reports/patient‐safety‐private‐hospitals‐known‐unknown‐risks(accessed 15/03/2023).

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3