Identification of eating, drinking and swallowing difficulties for people living with early‐stage dementia: A systematic review

Author:

O'Neill Michelle12ORCID,Duffy Orla12ORCID,Henderson Mo3,Kernohan W George2

Affiliation:

1. Speech and Language Therapy, School of Health Sciences Ulster University Londonderry UK

2. Institute of Nursing and Health Research Ulster University Londonderry UK

3. Northern Health and Social Care Trust Antrim UK

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe prevalence of dementia is increasing, bringing a range of challenges, such as eating, drinking and swallowing (EDS) difficulties, that are associated with aspiration, which can be fatal. Early identification of EDS difficulty in early‐stage dementia could prevent complications, but reliable indicators are needed to help develop pathways to support the diagnosis. Previous reviews of this area require updating.AimsTo identify reliable and clinically measurable indicators of EDS difficulty used in early‐stage dementia.Methods & ProceduresA systematic search was conducted using common databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsychInfo). Articles reporting indicators of EDS difficulty in early‐stage dementia or mild cognitive impairment were included. The reliability of included studies was critically appraised using the risk of bias tools. Study outcomes were narratively reviewed by considering the reliability, clinical measurability and applicability of EDS indicators to early‐stage dementia.Outcomes & ResultsInitial searches returned 2443 articles. After removing duplicates, limiting to English language and human studies, 1589 articles remained. After reviewing titles, 60 abstracts were reviewed, yielding 18 full‐text articles. A total of 12 articles were excluded that did not report at least one indicator of EDS difficulty in early‐stage dementia, or where the reported association was not strong. Six included studies that reported eight indicators of EDS difficulty in early‐stage dementia (four studies including people with Alzheimer's disease). On the balance of measurability, reliability and applicability, the most promising indicators of EDS difficulty were: delayed oral transit, rinsing ability, sarcopenia and polypharmacy. Additional, less reliable and applicable indicators included: always opened lips and non‐amnestic mild cognitive impairment, especially in men. The delayed pharyngeal response is subjectively measured when instrumental assessment is not available and the ‘candy sucking test’ cannot be recommended because there is an inherent choking risk.Conclusions & ImplicationsEDS difficulty in early‐stage dementia can be highlighted by indicators that could be combined to create enhanced pathways to support the early identification of EDS difficulties for people living with early‐stage dementia with a view to preventing complications and facilitating informed discussions regarding wishes in the event of further deterioration. Exploring the experiences of people living with dementia and their families’ perspectives on potential indicators of EDS difficulty may add to the existing evidence base.WHAT THIS PAPER ADDSWhat is already known on the subject Early identification of EDS difficulty in early‐stage dementia may prevent complications, but more reliable and clinically measurable indicators of EDS difficulty are needed to help develop pathways to support diagnosis.What this paper adds to existing knowledge A comprehensive range of studies related to EDS identification in early‐stage dementia have been selected and reviewed. Across six included studies, the most promising indicators of EDS difficulty in early‐stage dementia included delayed oral transit, poor rinsing ability, presence of sarcopenia and polypharmacy.What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? This study could help to develop pathways to support the early identification of EDS difficulties for people living with early‐stage dementia with a view to preventing complications and facilitating informed discussions regarding wishes in the event of further deterioration.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Speech and Hearing,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3