Alouette‐R normative data for French‐speaking school‐aged children living in Quebec

Author:

Champagne Lou1ORCID,Safi Dima2,Gauthier Bruno1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology Université de Montréal Montreal QC Canada

2. Department of Speech Language Pathology Université du Québec à Trois‐Rivières Trois‐Rivières QC Canada

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe Alouette‐R (2005) by Lefavrais is one of the most widely used tools to assess reading skills in French. However, this instrument does not have normative data specific to the French‐speaking population of Quebec, Canada.AimsThe validity of an assessment being strongly compromised when using inappropriate norms, the first objective of this study was to establish local norms for the Alouette‐R. The second objective was to provide sensitivity and specificity data for each Alouette‐R measure in the French‐speaking Quebec population. The third objective was to compare Quebec and French normative data and their sensitivity to better understand the applicability and effectiveness of the Alouette‐R test at the regional level.Methods & ProceduresA total of 347 fluent readers and 48 children with dyslexia from 3rd to 6th grades were recruited from different regions in Quebec. Participants had to read aloud the 265‐word text of the Alouette‐R in a maximum of 3 min.Outcomes & ResultsNorms (means, standard deviations and percentiles) by school grades were created for each test measure: reading time, number of words read, number of errors, number of words correctly read, reading accuracy index and reading fluency index. The sensitivity (i.e., the ability to correctly identify children with dyslexia) and specificity (i.e., the ability to correctly identify children without dyslexia) of these measurements were also documented. The norms and their sensitivity were then compared with those of the original French study by Lefavrais in 2005.Conclusions & ImplicationsThe presence of differences between European and Quebec norms supports the importance of using local norms when assessing language skills. The reading accuracy and fluency indexes are the measurements that best discriminated children with dyslexia from those without a reading disorder in our study. This study will allow clinicians working in Quebec to have a better interpretation of the Alouette‐R measurements and ultimately avoid erroneous conclusions resulting from the use of foreign normative data.What this paper addsWhat is already known on this subject The Alouette‐R is a reading test validated and standardized in France to screen for dyslexia in children. The validity of existing norms with the Quebec population in Canada is questionable due to socio‐linguistic differences with the population of France.What this study adds to existing knowledge This study provides for the first time normative and sensitivity/specificity data of the Alouette‐R for French‐speaking school‐aged children living in Quebec. Differences were noted with the normative data from France, which supports the importance of using local normative data when administering reading tests in Quebec.What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? When administering the Alouette‐R, clinicians in Quebec will now be able to use normative data adapted to the local population, which will limit erroneous conclusions resulting from the use of foreign normative data. In addition, the sensitivity and specificity values reported in the article will allow these clinicians to better interpret their results when screening for a developmental reading disorder.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference50 articles.

1. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

2. Efficacité, sensibilité, spécificité : comparaison de différents tests de lecture

3. Regard rétrospectif sur la norme du français québécois oral

4. Analyse psychométrique d'outils d’évaluation utilisés auprès des enfants francophones. [Psychometric analysis of assessment tools used with Francophone children];Bouchard M.‐E.G.;Canadian Journal of Speech–Language Pathology and Audiology,2009

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3