Affiliation:
1. Department of Health Promotion and Development, School of Nursing University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA
2. Midwifery Institute Thomas Jefferson University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
Abstract
AbstractAs faculty in two different midwifery education programs, we have stopped teaching the Caldwell–Moloy classifications of the female pelvis, as have faculty in several other US midwifery programs. In this commentary, we explain the rationale for this change. We review the roots of the Caldwell–Moloy pelvic classification and the lack of contemporary scientific support for either classifying pelvic types or using such a classification for clinical decision‐making, and propose an alternative approach to teaching assessment of the bony pelvis.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献