Pregnancy experiences of transgender and gender‐expansive individuals: A systematic scoping review from a critical midwifery perspective

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundEvidence suggests that transgender and gender‐expansive people are more likely to have suboptimal pregnancy outcomes compared with cisgender people. The aim of this study was to gain a deeper understanding of the role of midwifery in these inequities by analyzing the pregnancy experiences of transgender and gender‐expansive people from a critical midwifery perspective.MethodsWe conducted a systematic scoping review. We included 15 papers published since 2010 that reported on pregnancy experiences of people who had experienced gestational pregnancy at least once, and were transgender, nonbinary, or had other gender‐expansive identities.ResultsThree themes emerged from our analysis: “Navigating identity during pregnancy,” “Experiences with mental health and wellbeing,” and “Encounters in the maternal and newborn care system.” Although across studies respondents reported positive experiences, both within healthcare and social settings, access to gender‐affirmative (midwifery) care and daily social realities were often shaped by trans‐negativity and transphobia.DiscussionTo improve care outcomes of transgender and gender‐expansive people, it is necessary to counter anti‐trans ideologies by “fixing the knowledge” of midwifery curricula. This requires challenging dominant cultural norms and images around pregnancy, reconsidering the way in which the relationship among “sex,” “gender,” and “pregnancy” is understood and given meaning to in midwifery, and applying an intersectional lens to investigate the relationship between gender inequality and reproductive inequity of people with multiple, intersecting marginalized identities who may experience the accumulated impacts of racism, ageism, and classism. Future research should identify pedagogical frameworks that are suitable for guiding implementation efforts.