Attitudes and Behaviours Regarding COVID‐19 Mitigation Strategies in Australians With an Underlying Health Condition: A Cross‐Sectional Study

Author:

Soh Sze‐Ee12ORCID,Ayton Darshini2ORCID,Bevins Amelia2ORCID,Skouteris Helen2,Trent Mallory3,MacIntyre Raina34

Affiliation:

1. Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Ageing and Independent Living Research Centre School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University Frankston Victoria Australia

2. Health and Social Care Unit School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University Frankston Victoria Australia

3. Biosecurity Program The Kirby Institute, The University of New South Wales Kensington New South Wales Australia

4. College of Public Service & Community Solutions, and College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University Tempe Arizona USA

Abstract

ABSTRACTBackgroundPublic health strategies have focused on preventing and slowing the transmission of COVID‐19 by promoting the uptake of mitigation strategies. However, little is known about the uptake of these strategies in the presence of underlying health conditions.ObjectivesTo describe the attitudes and behaviours of a sample of Australians towards COVID‐19 mitigation strategies, and determine if uptake of these strategies differed across different health conditions.DesignCross‐sectional study.Setting and ParticipantsNational survey of Australian residents over 18 years.Main Outcome MeasuresA purpose‐built survey was used to collect participants' attitudes and behaviours towards COVID‐19 mitigation strategies.ResultsOver half (53%) of the 2867 participants (99% completion rate) reported having one or more comorbidities. The most commonly self‐reported health condition was cardiometabolic conditions (28%). Most participants disagreed that masks were no longer needed (74%) and wanted the 5‐day isolation mandate (66%). More than one‐third would like masks to be mandated for indoor spaces (38%) and 25% avoided going to hospitals. Participants with allergies (OR 1.37; 95% CI 1.14, 1.65), cardiometabolic (OR 1.49; 95% CI 1.23, 1.79), respiratory (OR 1.32; 95% CI 1.07, 1.62) and neurological (OR 1.62; 95% CI 1.12, 2.32) conditions were more likely to avoid using public transport compared to those without. In contrast, participants with underlying mental health conditions were less likely to use N95/P2 facemasks in public spaces (OR 0.46; 95% CI 0.25, 0.87) compared to those without.ConclusionsA substantial proportion of Australians continued to adopt COVID‐19 mitigation measures or expressed a desire for more mitigations, including mandatory isolation for COVID‐19, despite the lack of mandates. People with an underlying health condition who represent more than half of all adults appear to be more careful with mitigations to avoid COVID‐19.Patient or Public ContributionMembers of the public were invited to participate in a soft launch of the survey between 4th and 5th January 2023 to test flow and functionality, and to allow the final wording of survey questions to be refined as required.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3