Federal telehealth policy changes during the COVID‐19 public health emergency: Associations with telemental health use among rural and urban Medicare beneficiaries

Abstract

AbstractPurposeThe COVID‐19 public health emergency (PHE) led to increased mental health (MH) concerns among Medicare beneficiaries while inhibiting their access to MH services (MHS). To help address these problems, the federal government introduced temporary flexibilities permitting broader telehealth use in Medicare. This study compared rural versus urban patterns of change in telemental health (TMH) use among adult MHS users in fee‐for‐service Medicare from 2019 to 2020, when PHE‐related telehealth expansions were enacted.MethodsIn this cross‐sectional investigation based on 2019–2020 Medicare claims data, we used chi‐square tests, t‐tests and adjusted logistic regression to explore how year (pre‐PHE vs. PHE), rurality, and beneficiary characteristics were related to TMH use.FindingsFrom 2019 to 2020, the proportion of MHS users who used TMH rose from 4.8% to 51.9% among rural residents (p < 0.0001) and from 1.1% to 61.3% (p < 0.0001) among urban residents. Across study years, adjusted odds of TMH use grew more than 18‐fold for rural MHS users (OR = 18.10, p < 0.001) and nearly 120‐fold for their urban counterparts (OR = 119.75, p < 0.001). Among rural MHS users in 2020, adjusted odds of TMH use diminished with increasing age.ConclusionsTMH mitigated PHE‐related barriers to MHS access for rural and urban beneficiaries, but urban residents benefited disproportionately. Among rural beneficiaries, older age was related to lower TMH use. To avoid reinforcing existing MHS access disparities, policies must address factors limiting TMH use among rural beneficiaries, especially those over 75 and those from historically underserved communities.