Possible high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (pHSIL) in the new cervical screening paradigm: The outcomes and the role of clinicopathological review-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Possible high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (pHSIL) in the new cervical screening paradigm: The outcomes and the role of clinicopathological review

Published:2021-05-03 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:0004-8666
Container-title:Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
language:en
Short-container-title:Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol

Author:

McGauran Monica Francesca Giannini¹^ORCID,Pendlebury Adam Bernard²,Hiscock Richard John³⁴,Lamont Julie M.²,Jones Antonia P.M.²⁵,Grant Peter²,Newman Marsali Ruth⁶,Ireland‐Jenkin Kerryn⁶,McGrath Shaun²,Pham Kim⁷,Hyde Simon²

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology The Mercy Hospital for Women Melbourne VictoriaAustralia

2. Department of Gynaecological Oncology The Mercy Hospital for Women Melbourne VictoriaAustralia

3. Translational Obstetrics Group Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology The Mercy Hospital for Women, University of Melbourne Melbourne VictoriaAustralia

4. Mercy Perinatal The Mercy Hospital for Women Melbourne VictoriaAustralia

5. Department of Gynaecological Oncology The Royal Women’s Hospital Melbourne VictoriaAustralia

6. Department of Anatomical Pathology Austin Health Melbourne Victoria Australia

7. Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology The Northern Hospital Melbourne Victoria Australia

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynaecology,General Medicine

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/ajo.13348

Reference25 articles.

1. BuddA HammondI Cancer Council Australia Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines Working Party. [Version URL:https://wiki.cancer.org.au/australiawiki/index.php?oldid=190188. Cited 24 July 2020.]. Available from URL:https://wiki.cancer.org.au/australia/Guidelines:Cervical_cancer/Screening/Cervical_Cancer_in_Australia. In: Cancer Council Australia Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines Working Party.National Cervical Screening Program: Guidelines for the management of screen‐detected abnormalities screening in specific populations and investigation of abnormal vaginal bleeding.Sydney:Cancer Council Australia. Available from URL:https://wiki.cancer.org.au/australia/Guidelines:Cervical_cancer/Screening

2. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2018.Cervical screening in Australia 2018. Cat. no. CAN 111.Canberra:AIHW. Available from URL:https://www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/8a26b34d‐a912‐4f01‐b646‐dc5d0ca54f03/aihw‐can‐111.pdf.aspx?inline=true

3. Cancer Council Australia Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines Working Party. [Version URL:https://wiki.cancer.org.au/australiawiki/index.php?oldid=190187 cited 2020 Sep 1]. Available from URL:https://wiki.cancer.org.au/australia/Guidelines:Cervical_cancer/Screening/Summary_of_recommendations. In: Cancer Council Australia Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines Working Party.National Cervical Screening Program: Guidelines for the management of screen‐detected abnormalities screening in specific populations and investigation of abnormal vaginal bleeding.Sydney:Cancer Council Australia. Available from URL:https://wiki.cancer.org.au/australia/Guidelines:Cervical_cancer/Screening

4. AndersonL SavilleM WrightG Cancer Council Australia Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines Working Party. [Version URL:https://wiki.cancer.org.au/australiawiki/index.php?oldid=190192 cited 2020 Jul 24]. Available from URL: ">https://wiki.cancer.org.au/australia/Guidelines:Cervical_cancer/Screening/Cytology_and_AMBS_2004_terminology_for_reporting. In: Cancer Council Australia Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines Working Party.National Cervical Screening Program: Guidelines for the management of screen‐detected abnormalities screening in specific populations and investigation of abnormal vaginal bleeding.Sydney:Cancer Council Australia. Available from URL:https://wiki.cancer.org.au/australia/Guidelines:Cervical_cancer/Screening

5. Is Atypical Squamous Cells That Cannot Exclude High-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Clinically Significant?