Safety of e‐cigarettes and nicotine patches as stop‐smoking aids in pregnancy: Secondary analysis of the Pregnancy Trial of E‐cigarettes and Patches (PREP) randomized controlled trial

Author:

Pesola Francesca1,Smith Katie Myers1ORCID,Phillips‐Waller Anna1ORCID,Przulj Dunja1ORCID,Griffiths Christopher1,Walton Robert2,McRobbie Hayden3ORCID,Coleman Tim4ORCID,Lewis Sarah4,Whitemore Rachel4,Clark Miranda4ORCID,Ussher Michael5ORCID,Sinclair Lesley6,Seager Emily1,Cooper Sue4,Bauld Linda6,Naughton Felix7ORCID,Sasieni Peter1,Manyonda Isaac8,Hajek Peter1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Wolfson Institute of Population Health Queen Mary University of London London UK

2. Blizard Institute Queen Mary University of London London UK

3. National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre University of New South Wales Sydney Australia

4. Centre for Academic Primary Care University of Nottingham Nottingham UK

5. Division of Population Health Sciences and Education, St George's, University of London and Institute of Social Marketing and Health University of Stirling Stirling UK

6. Usher Institute and SPECTRUM Consortium University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK

7. School of Health Sciences University of East Anglia Norwich UK

8. St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London UK

Abstract

AbstractAimsThe aim of this study was to examine the safety of e‐cigarettes (EC) and nicotine patches (NRT) when used to help pregnant smokers quit.DesignA recent trial of EC versus NRT reported safety outcomes in the randomized arms. We conducted a further analysis based on product use.SettingTwenty‐three hospitals in England and a stop‐smoking service in Scotland took part.ParticipantsThe participants comprised 1140 pregnant smokers.InterventionsWe compared women using and not using EC and NRT regularly during pregnancy.MeasurementsMeasurements included nicotine intake compared with baseline, birth weight, other pregnancy outcomes, adverse events, maternal respiratory symptoms and relapse in early abstainers.FindingsUse of EC was more common than use of NRT (47.3% vs 21.6%, P < 0.001). Women who stopped smoking (abstainers) and used EC at the end‐of‐pregnancy (EOP) reduced their salivary cotinine by 45% [49.3 ng/ml, 95% confidence interval (CI) = −79.8 to −10]. Only one abstainer used NRT at EOP. In dual users, cotinine increased by 19% (24 ng/ml, 95% CI = 3.5–68). In women reporting a reduction of at least 50% in cigarette consumption, cotinine levels increased by 10% in those using nicotine products and by 9% in those who did not. Birth weights in dual users and exclusive smokers were the same (3.1 kg). Birth weight in abstainers using either nicotine product was higher than in smokers [3.3 kg, standard deviation (SD) = 0.7] versus 3.1 kg, SD = 0.6; difference = 0.15 kg, 95% CI = 0.05–0.25) and not different from abstainers not using nicotine products (3.1 kg, SD = 0.8). Abstainers and smokers using nicotine products had no worse pregnancy outcomes or more adverse events than abstainers and smokers not using them. EC users reported more improvements than non‐users in cough [adjusted relative risk (aRR) = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.37–0.93] and phlegm (aRR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.31–0.92), controlling for smoking status. EC or NRT use had no association with relapse.ConclusionsRegular use of e‐cigarettes or nicotine patches by pregnant smokers does not appear to be associated with any adverse outcomes.

Funder

Health Technology Assessment Programme

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Medicine (miscellaneous)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3