Affiliation:
1. Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich Munich Germany
Abstract
AbstractThis paper analyzes what may be called Olympic Internationalism as a framework for comparing literatures in the early twentieth century. Specifically, it analyzes the practice of tabulating information about the Nobel Prize—in the Swedish Academy, the international press, and repositories of general knowledge such as encyclopedias—and argues that the international circulation of such “thin knowledge” (Orsini) formed the very basis for that framework of comparison. This, it is further argued, played a crucial role in shaping the international perception of what world literature is and in making the Nobel Prize in Literature what it is: a globally acknowledged “world prize.”
Subject
Literature and Literary Theory
Reference58 articles.
1. Alfred Noble [sic] Prizes The. (1904 December 25).The Spokesman‐Review.
2. Anatole France's successors. (1924 October 20).New York Times.
3. Nationalism
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Is this it?;Tidskrift för litteraturvetenskap;2024-06-19
2. The Look of the Book;Journal of World Literature;2024-03-14
3. What Is a ‘World Academy’?;Journal of World Literature;2024-03-14
4. The Entangled Histories of the Nobel Prize in Literature and PEN;J WORLD LIT;2024
5. Wer wird nominiert, wer gewinnt?;Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik;2024-03