Effectiveness of systemic treatments on pruritus associated with atopic dermatitis: A systematic review in pediatric patients

Abstract

AbstractBackground/ObjectivesItch is one of the hallmarks of atopic dermatitis (AD), which has a significant impact on the quality of life of pediatric patients with AD and their caregivers. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta‐analysis to evaluate the antipruritic effects of systemic AD treatments in pediatric patients with AD.MethodsPubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were searched, including studies providing original data on the effects of systemic treatment on pruritus in pediatric patients (<18 years) with AD. Placebo‐controlled trials reporting a Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale 4 (PP‐NRS4) response were included in a meta‐analysis.ResultsA total of 30 studies were included, with most evidence available for dupilumab. Overall, marked improvements of pruritus (50% or greater reduction in pruritus outcome measurements) were found for treatment with cyclosporin A (2–16 years), dupilumab (6 months–17 years), abrocitinib, and upadacitinib (both 12 and 17 years). Nemolizumab (12–17 years) may be promising in reducing pruritus in pediatric patients; however, data are limited. Only five randomized controlled trials could be included in our meta‐analysis, in which dupilumab, abrocitinib, and upadacitinib showed a significantly higher probability of achieving a PP‐NRS4 response compared with placebo. Our study was limited by a lack of homogeneity of included studies.ConclusionsCyclosporin A, dupilumab, abrocitinib, and upadacitinib are all effective in decreasing pruritus and, therefore, in improving the quality of life in children with AD. As more systemic treatments for AD become available, it will be imperative to incorporate patient‐oriented treatment goals such as reduction of pruritus into therapeutic decision‐making.