Systemic treatments in Parthenium dermatitis: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Akham Rojita1ORCID,Bhatia Riti1ORCID,Das Amity2ORCID,Bhadoria Ajeet Singh2,Pathak Mona3,Hazarika Neirita1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy All India Institute of Medical Sciences Rishikesh India

2. Department of Community and Family Medicine All India Institute of Medical Sciences Rishikesh India

3. O'Deniall Jr School of public health UT Southwestern Dallas Texas USA

Abstract

AbstractParthenium dermatitis is the commonest form of plant dermatitis in India, caused by the plant Parthenium hysterophorus. Systemic immunosuppressives are commonly employed in its treatment. However, there is a relative lack of comparative head‐to‐head trials. This study was done to assess the relative efficacy and safety of systemic treatments in Parthenium dermatitis. We systematically reviewed all the published studies investigating the safety and efficacy of systemic treatments for Parthenium dermatitis in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, and clinical trial registries. Treatment benefit data were tabulated based on outcome measures of scoring systems. The quality of evidence for each outcome was assessed by Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria for meta‐analysis. The pooled Standardized mean difference (SMD) for case series and comparative studies based on clinical severity score (CSS) for azathioprine was 4.007 (95% CI (Confidence interval): 3.141, 4.873) and 0.746 (95% CI: 0.139, 1.352), respectively. About 88.8% (95% CI: 76.8%, 100.8%, p = 0.076) of the patients had excellent or a good response to azathioprine. Our meta‐analysis shows that azathioprine has the highest level of evidence in the treatment of Parthenium dermatitis.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Dermatology,Immunology and Allergy

Reference25 articles.

1. Patch testing with the European standard series and Compositae extracts in patients with airborne contact dermatitis

2. Clinical profile and quality of life of patients with occupational contact dermatitis from New Delhi, India

3. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement

4. The Cochrane collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials;Higgins JP;BMJ,2011

5. ROBINS‐I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non‐randomized studies of interventions;Sterne JA;BMJ,2016

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Beyond Avoidance: Advanced Therapies for Contact Dermatitis;The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice;2024-09

2. Managing Contact Dermatitis Without Patch Testing;The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice;2024-09

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3