A novel indirect ELISA for serodiagnosis of mucormycosis using antigens from Rhizopus arrhizus

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundDue to a delay in diagnosis by conventional techniques and high mortality, the development of a standardised and rapid non‐culture‐based technique is an unmet need in pulmonary, gastrointestinal, and disseminated forms of mucormycosis. Though limited studies have been conducted for molecular diagnosis, there are no established serologic tests for this highly fatal infection.ObjectiveTo develop and evaluate an indirect in‐house enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) utilising antigens of Rhizopus arrhizus for detecting anti‐Rhizopus antibodies (IgG and IgM) in sera of patients with mucormycosis.MethodsWe extracted both secretory and mycelial Rhizopus antigens using standardised protocols. Bradford assay was used for protein quantification. We then standardised an indirect ELISA using R. arrhizus mycelial and secretory antigens (10.0 μg/mL in bicarbonate buffer pH 9.2) for detecting anti‐Rhizopus IgG and IgM antibodies in patient sera. We included patients with mucormycosis, other fungal infections, and healthy controls. Antibody index value (E‐value) was calculated for each patient sample.ResultsAsparagine broth culture filtrate utilising 85% ammonium sulphate salt fractionation and mycelial homogenate grown in yeast extract peptone dextrose (YPD) broth precipitated with trichloroacetic acid (TCA) yielded a large amount of good‐quality protein for the assay. We included 55 patients with mucormycosis (rhino‐orbito‐cerebral mucormycosis [ROCM, n = 39], pulmonary [n = 15], gastrointestinal [n = 1]), 24 with other fungal infections (probable aspergillosis [n = 14], candidiasis [n = 10]), and healthy controls (n = 16). The sensitivity of the antibody test for diagnosing mucormycosis ranged from 83.6–92.7% for IgG and 72.7–87.3% for IgM, with a specificity of 91.7–92.5% for IgG and 80–82.5% for IgM. The sera from patients with other fungal infections and healthy individuals did not show significant cross‐reactivity.ConclusionThe detection of anti‐Rhizopus IgG antibody performed significantly better in comparison to IgM‐based ELISA for diagnosing both ROCM (sensitivity of 84.6% vs. 69.2%) and pulmonary cases (86.6% vs. 80.0%). More extensive studies are required to confirm our findings.