SI‐CBPAR: Towards structural indicators of community‐based participatory action research

Author:

Meyerson Beth E.123ORCID,Russell Danielle M.145,Mahoney Arlene156,Garnett Irene5,Samorano Savannah5

Affiliation:

1. Harm Reduction Research Lab University of Arizona Tucson USA

2. Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine University of Arizona Tucson USA

3. Comprehensive Pain and Addiction Center University of Arizona Health Sciences Tucson USA

4. Justice Studies Tempe USA

5. Drug Policy Research and Advocacy Board, Harm Reduction Research Lab University of Arizona Tucson USA

6. Southwest Recovery Alliance Phoenix USA

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionStructural aspects of community‐engaged research are not well measured yet have critical implications for community research empowerment. This is particularly so with people who use drugs. We introduce the Structural Indicators of Community‐Based Participatory Action Research (SI‐CBPAR) to measure structural indicators of community‐research entity relationships.MethodsA three‐phased process of iterative development, feasibility and applicability assessment was used to examine the instrument with community‐engaged studies as a first stage of instrument development. The development team included people with university, non‐government organisation and lived/ing drug use experience. Four studies on the health of people who use drugs were reviewed for indicator evidence followed by iterative discussion about construct and item discrepancies. Indicators were measured for the degree to which they were observed using a three‐point scale.ResultsAll but two constructs were confirmed for meaning. Constructs of ‘community’ and ‘coalition’ required revision and explanation. The need for further exploration of power differentials between community and community‐based organisations was identified. Indicator evidence was found for all six categories across studies. The instrument was deemed applicable and easy to use. It was observed that categories could apply to studies with various degrees of community engagement and to other research focal areas.Discussion and ConclusionsSI‐CBPAR applicability testing and initial category confirmation indicate its potential utility for community research collaboratives. The next phase of development involves cognitive interviewing with researchers from across community engaged research orientations, and with communities engaged in research beyond drug user health.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Health (social science),Medicine (miscellaneous)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3