Efficacy and safety of antidepressants for pain in older adults: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Narayan Sujita W.12ORCID,Naganathan Vasi34ORCID,Vizza Lisa12ORCID,Underwood Martin56ORCID,Ivers Rowena7ORCID,McLachlan Andrew J.8ORCID,Zhou Linyi1ORCID,Singh Ramnik1ORCID,Tao Shunyu1ORCID,Xi Xiao1,Abdel Shaheed Christina12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health The University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia

2. Sydney Local Health District Institute for Musculoskeletal Health Sydney New South Wales Australia

3. Centre for Education and Research on Ageing, Department of Geriatric Medicine Concord Repatriation General Hosp Concord New South Wales Australia

4. Concord Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia

5. Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School University of Warwick Coventry UK

6. University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire Coventry UK

7. Graduate School of Medicine, Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health University of Wollongong Wollongong New South Wales Australia

8. Sydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia

Abstract

AimsIn many countries, pain is the most common indication for use of antidepressants in older adults. We reviewed the evidence from randomized controlled trials on the efficacy and safety of antidepressants, compared to all alternatives for pain in older adults (aged ≥65 years).MethodsTrials published from inception to 1 February 2024, were retrieved from 13 databases. Two independent reviewers extracted data on study and participant characteristics, primary efficacy (pain scores, converted to 0–100 scale) and harms. Estimates for efficacy were pooled using a random effects model and reported as difference in means and 95% CI. Quality of included trials was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool.ResultsFifteen studies (n = 1369 participants) met the inclusion criteria. The most frequently studied antidepressants were duloxetine and amitriptyline (6/15 studies each). Pain related to knee osteoarthritis was the most studied (6/15 studies). For knee osteoarthritis, antidepressants did not provide a statistically significant effect for the immediate term (0–2 weeks), (−5.6, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −11.5 to 0.3), but duloxetine provided a statistically significant, albeit a very small effect in the intermediate term, (≥6 weeks and <12 months), (−9.1, 95% CI: −11.8 to −6.4). Almost half (7/15) of the studies reported increased withdrawal of participants in the antidepressant treatment group vs. the comparator group due to adverse events.ConclusionsFor most chronic painful conditions, the benefits and harms of antidepressant medicines are unclear. This evidence is predominantly from trials with sample sizes of <100, have disclosed industry ties and classified as having unclear or high risk of bias.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3