The effect of a non‐congregate, integrated care shelter on health: A qualitative study

Author:

Alexander Karen1ORCID,Nordeck Courtney D.1,Rosecrans Amanda2,Harris Robert2,Collins Alexander1,Gryczynski Jan1

Affiliation:

1. Friends Research Institute Baltimore Maryland

2. Baltimore City Health Department Baltimore Maryland

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo describe the experiences of unstably housed, medically vulnerable residents living at the Haven, a novel, non‐congregate integrated care shelter operating in a historic hotel during the COVID‐19 pandemic.DesignA qualitative descriptive design.Sample/MeasurementSemi‐structured qualitative interviews were conducted in February and March 2022 with a purposive sample of 20 residents living in the integrated care shelter. Data were analyzed in May and June 2022 using the thematic analysis methods described by Braun and Clarke.ResultsSix women and 14 men, ages 23–71 (M = 50, SD = 14), were interviewed. Lengths of stay at the time of the interview ranged from 74 to 536 days (M = 311 days). Medical co‐morbidities and substance use details were collected at baseline. Three themes were identified: (1) Autonomy, (2) supportive environments, and (3) stability and the need for permanent housing. Participants characterized the integrated care, non‐congregate model as having multiple advantages over traditional shelter systems. Participants emphasized the role of nurses and case managers in providing a respectful, caring environment in the integrated shelter model.ConclusionParticipants described acute physical and mental health needs which were largely met by the innovative integrated shelter care model. The effect of homelessness and housing insecurity on health is well documented, but few solutions exist that promote autonomy. Participants in this qualitative study emphasized the benefits of living in a non‐congregate integrated care shelter and the services which promoted their self‐management of chronic diseases.Patient or Public ContributionPatients were the participants in the study, but were not involved in the design, analysis of interpretation of the data, or preparation of the manuscript. Due to this project's small scope, we could not involve patients or the public after the study concluded data collection.

Funder

Friends Research Institute

National Institute on Drug Abuse

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,General Nursing

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3