Prognostic value of Salzburg nonconvulsive status epilepticus criteria: The SACE score

Author:

Misirocchi Francesco1ORCID,Zilioli Alessandro1,Mannini Elisa1,Lazzari Stefania1,Mutti Carlotta23,Zinno Lucia2,Parrino Liborio13,De Stefano Pia45ORCID,Florindo Irene2

Affiliation:

1. Unit of Neurology, Department of Medicine and Surgery University of Parma Parma Italy

2. Unit of Neurology, University Hospital of Parma Parma Italy

3. Sleep Disorders Center, Department of Medicine and Surgery University of Parma Parma Italy

4. EEG and Epilepsy Unit, Department of Clinical Neurosciences University Hospital of Geneva Geneva Switzerland

5. Neuro‐Intensive Care Unit, Department of Intensive Care University Hospital of Geneva Geneva Switzerland

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveThis study was undertaken to investigate the association between the Salzburg nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) criteria and in‐hospital outcome, to determine the predictive accuracy of the Status Epilepticus Severity Score (STESS), modified STESS (mSTESS), Epidemiology‐Based Mortality Score in Status Epilepticus (EMSE), and END‐IT (encephalitis, NCSE, diazepam resistance, imaging features, and tracheal intubation) in NCSE patients, and to develop a new prognostic score specifically designed for NCSE patients.MethodsClinical and electroencephalographic (EEG) data of adult patients treated for NCSE from 2020 to 2023 were retrospectively assessed. Age, sex, modified Rankin Scale at admission, comorbidities, history of seizures, etiology, status epilepticus type, and outcome were collected from the patients' digital charts. EEG data were assessed and categorized applying the Salzburg NCSE criteria. In‐hospital death was defined as the primary outcome.ResultsA total of 116 NCSE patients were included. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that Salzburg NCSE criterion A2 (ictal morphological, spatial, and temporal evolution) was associated with in‐hospital survival. The best STESS cutoff was ≥4 (sensitivity = .62, specificity = .69, accuracy = 67%). mSTESS ≥ 5 reached a sensitivity of .68, a specificity of .57, and an overall accuracy of 60%, EMSE ≥ 64 a sensitivity of .82, a specificity of .39, and an overall accuracy of 52%, and END‐IT ≥ 3 a sensitivity of .65, a specificity of .44, and an overall accuracy of 50%. Through a hypothesis‐generating approach, we developed the SACE score, which integrates EEG features (criterion A2) with patient age (with a 75‐year cutoff), history of seizures, and level of consciousness. With a cutoff of ≥3, it had a sensitivity of .77, a specificity of .74, and an overall accuracy of 76%, performing better than other prognostic scores.SignificanceWe developed a new user‐friendly scoring system, the SACE score, which integrates EEG features with other established outcome‐related variables assessable in early stages, to assist neurologists and neurointensivists in making more tailored prognostic decisions for NCSE patients.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Neurology

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3