Are short term outcomes superior following total knee arthroplasty when infra‐patellar fat pad is resected? A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundData suggests the infra‐patellar fat pad (IPFP) is resected in the majority of total knee arthroplasty cases. Current literature suggests there may be scope for increasing preservations rates. A systematic review and meta‐analysis of available literature was performed to assess if resection of IPFP resulted in superior patient outcomes.MethodsScopus, PubMed, Cochrane, Embase and CINAHL were systematically searched in February 2024 for articles of relevance and meta‐analysis conducted. A standardized mean difference and confidence interval of 95% was calculated. An odds ratio was calculated for all included datasets. Heterogeneity was assessed for using the I2 statistic.ResultsThirteen studies were included within this review. IPFP resection shortened the patella tendon at 6 months post‐operatively (OR, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.02–0.12, P = 0.006). Results favoured preservation at 12 months post‐operatively (OR, 0.02; 95% CI, −0.02 to 0.06, P = 0.32). Oxford Knee Society (OKS) results statistically favoured preservation at 6 months (OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 0.74–2.39, P = 0.0002). Findings at 12 months favoured resection (OR, −0.49; 95% CI, −5.39, 4.41, P = 0.84). Resection increased anterior knee pain at 6–12 months post‐operatively (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.12–1.89, P = 0.005). Combined subgroup analysis of flexion favoured resection (OR, −2.15; 95% CI, −6.52 to 2.22, P = 0.34).ConclusionOKS and patella tendon length results favoured preservation at 6 months however did not reach minimal clinically important difference. Combined subgroup analysis of flexion did not yield a statistically significant result. Rates of anterior knee pain at 6–12 months favoured preservation.