Identifying performance‐based outcome measures of physical function in people with haemophilia (IPOP)

Author:

Bladen Melanie12ORCID,Harbidge Hannah3,Drechsler Wendy3,Duport Gaetan4,Mahaffey Ryan5,van der Net Janjap6,Pérez‐Alenda Sofía7ORCID,Sayers Fionnuala8ORCID,Strike Karen9ORCID,Timmer Merel10ORCID,Stephensen David311ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Haemophilia Centre Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust London UK

2. Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health University College London London UK

3. Haemophilia Centre East Kent Hospitals University NHS Trust Canterbury UK

4. Association française des hémophiles Paris France

5. St Mary's University School of Sport, Health and Applied Sciences London UK

6. Center for Child Development, Exercise and physical literacy UMC Utrecht Utrecht Netherlands

7. Departamento de Fisioterapia Universitat de Valencia Valencia Spain

8. Haemophilia Centre Belfast City Hospital Belfast UK

9. Hamilton Niagara Regional Hemophilia Centre McMaster Children's Hospital McMaster University Hamilton Canada

10. Center for Benign Haematology, Thrombosis and Haemostasis Van Creveldkliniek University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands

11. Royal London Hospital Haemophilia Centre Barts Health NHS Trust London UK

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionRecent recommendations of core outcome sets for haemophilia highlight the need for including measures of performance‐based physical health and physical function sustainability. To date, there is no consensus on what outcomes might be of value to clinicians and patients.AimTo identify instruments of performance‐based physical function to monitor musculoskeletal health in people with haemophilia that are practical in the clinical setting.MethodsUtilising components from the Activities and Participation Category of the WHO International Classification of Functioning (WHO‐ICF), a consensus‐based, decision analysis approach was used to: identify activities people with haemophilia have most difficulty performing; identify quantitative performance‐based measures of identified activities via a scoping review; and obtain views on acceptability of the tests utilising a DELPHI approach.ResultsEleven activities were identified: maintaining a standing position, walking long distances, walking up and down stairs, walking on different surfaces, running, hopping, jumping, squatting, kneeling, undertaking a complex lower limb task, undertaking a complex upper limb task. Following a 2‐round DELPHI survey of international physiotherapists, the 6‐min walk test, timed up and down stairs, 30‐s sit to stand, single leg stance, tandem stance, single hop for distance (children only) and timed up and go (adults only) reached consensus.ConclusionThis study is the first step in defining a core set of performance‐based instruments to monitor physical health and sustainability of physical function outcomes in people with haemophilia. Establishing the psychometric properties of the instruments and whether they are meaningful to people with haemophilia is essential.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Genetics (clinical),Hematology,General Medicine

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3