Diverse pathways for climate resilience in marine fishery systems

Author:

Eurich Jacob G.12ORCID,Friedman Whitney R.34,Kleisner Kristin M.5ORCID,Zhao Lily Z.6ORCID,Free Christopher M.27ORCID,Fletcher Meghan78,Mason Julia G.5ORCID,Tokunaga Kanae9ORCID,Aguion Alba1011,Dell'Apa Andrea12ORCID,Dickey‐Collas Mark1314ORCID,Fujita Rod15,Golden Christopher D.16ORCID,Hollowed Anne B.17,Ishimura Gakushi18,Karr Kendra A.1519ORCID,Kasperski Stephen20,Kisara Yuga18,Lau Jacqueline D.21ORCID,Mangubhai Sangeeta22ORCID,Osman Layla15,Pecl Gretta T.2324ORCID,Schmidt Jörn O.1325,Allison Edward H.2627ORCID,Sullivan Patrick J.28,Cinner Joshua E.21ORCID,Griffis Roger B.29ORCID,McClanahan Timothy R.30ORCID,Stedman Richard C.28,Mills Katherine E.9ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Environmental Defense Fund Santa Barbara California USA

2. Marine Sciences Institute University of California Santa Barbara California USA

3. National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis University of California Santa Barbara California USA

4. Environmental Studies Department University of California Santa Cruz California USA

5. Environmental Defense Fund Boston Massachusetts USA

6. Department of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology University of California Santa Barbara California USA

7. Bren School of Environmental Science and Management University of California Santa Barbara California USA

8. The Nature Conservancy San Diego California USA

9. Gulf of Maine Research Institute Portland Maine USA

10. Coasts and Commons Co‐Lab, Nicholas School of the Environment Duke University Durham North Carolina USA

11. Future Oceans Lab CIM‐Universidade de Vigo Vigo Spain

12. Independent International Consultant Monrovia California USA

13. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) Copenhagen Denmark

14. National Institute for Aquatic Resources Technical University of Denmark Copenhagen Denmark

15. Environmental Defense Fund San Francisco California USA

16. Department of Nutrition Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health Boston Massachusetts USA

17. School of Fishery and Aquatic Sciences University of Washington Seattle Washington USA

18. Faculty of Agriculture Iwate University Morioka Japan

19. Institute of Marine Sciences University of California Santa Cruz California USA

20. Alaska Fisheries Science Center National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Seattle Washington USA

21. College of Arts, Society and Education James Cook University Townsville Queensland Australia

22. Talanoa Consulting Suva Fiji

23. Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies University of Tasmania Hobart Tasmania Australia

24. Centre for Marine Socioecology University of Tasmania Hobart Tasmania Australia

25. Christian‐Albrechts‐Universität zu Kiel Kiel Germany

26. WorldFish Penang Malaysia

27. Lancaster Environment Center University of Lancaster Lancaster United Kingdom

28. Department of Natural Resources and the Environment Cornell University Ithaca New York USA

29. Office of Science and Technology National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Silver Spring Maryland USA

30. Global Marine Programs Wildlife Conservation Society Bronx New York USA

Abstract

AbstractBoth the ecological and social dimensions of fisheries are being affected by climate change. As a result, policymakers, managers, scientists and fishing communities are seeking guidance on how to holistically build resilience to climate change. Numerous studies have highlighted key attributes of resilience in fisheries, yet concrete examples that explicitly link these attributes to social‐ecological outcomes are lacking. To better understand climate resilience, we assembled 18 case studies spanning ecological, socio‐economic, governance and geographic contexts. Using a novel framework for evaluating 38 resilience attributes, the case studies were systematically assessed to understand how attributes enable or inhibit resilience to a given climate stressor. We found population abundance, learning capacity, and responsive governance were the most important attributes for conferring resilience, with ecosystem connectivity, place attachment, and accountable governance scoring the strongest across the climate‐resilient fisheries. We used these responses to develop an attribute typology that describes robust sources of resilience, actionable priority attributes and attributes that are case specific or require research. We identified five fishery archetypes to guide stakeholders as they set long‐term goals and prioritize actions to improve resilience. Lastly, we found evidence for two pathways to resilience: (1) building ecological assets and strengthening communities, which we observed in rural and small‐scale fisheries, and (2) building economic assets and improving effective governance, which was demonstrated in urban and wealthy fisheries. Our synthesis presents a novel framework that can be directly applied to identify approaches, pathways and actionable levers for improving climate resilience in fishery systems.

Funder

David and Lucile Packard Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Aquatic Science,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics,Oceanography

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3