Prostate‐specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography in addition to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and biopsies to select prostate cancer patients for focal therapy

Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate the additional value of prostate‐specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA‐PET) to conventional diagnostic tools to select patients for hemi‐ablative focal therapy (FT).Patients and MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis on a multicentre cohort (private and institutional) of 138 patients who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), PSMA‐PET, and systematic biopsies prior to radical prostatectomy between January 2011 and July 2021. Patients were eligible when they met the consensus criteria for FT: PSA <15 ng/mL, clinical/radiological T stage ≤T2b, and International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade 2–3. Clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) was defined as ISUP grade ≥2, extracapsular extension >0.5 mm or seminal vesicle involvement at final histopathology. The diagnostic accuracy of mpMRI, systematic biopsies and PSMA‐PET for csPCa (separate and combined) was calculated within a four‐quadrant prostate model by receiver‐operating characteristic and 2 × 2 contingency analysis. Additionally, we assessed whether the diagnostic tools correctly identified patients suitable for hemi‐ablative FT.ResultsIn total 552 prostate quadrants were analysed and 272 (49%) contained csPCa on final histopathology. The area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for csPCa were 0.79, 75%, 83%, 81% and 77%, respectively, for combined mpMRI and systematic biopsies, and improved after addition of PSMA‐PET to 0.84, 87%, 80%, 81% and 86%, respectively (P < 0.001). On final histopathology 46/138 patients (33%) were not suitable for hemi‐ablative FT. Addition of PSMA‐PET correctly identified 26/46 (57%) non‐suitable patients and resulted in 4/138 (3%) false‐positive exclusions.ConclusionsAddition of PSMA‐PET to the conventional work‐up by mpMRI and systematic biopsies could improve selection for hemi‐ablative FT and guide exclusion of patients for whom whole‐gland treatments might be a more suitable treatment option.