Disorders of compulsivity: Deficits in arbitrating learning strategies

Abstract

AbstractWhile previous research has shown that compulsivity is related to an imbalance between goal‐directed and habitual learning systems, very little is known about whether this effect is due to the impairment of a single system or the impairment of the arbitration mechanism that determines which system controls behaviour at any given moment; the current study aims to address this disagreement. Nineteen alcohol use disorder, 30 obsessive‐compulsive disorder (OCD) and 20 major depressive disorder patients and corresponding sex‐ and age‐matched controls performed two‐choice, three‐stage Markov decision‐making paradigm. Model‐based and mode‐free reinforcement learning models were used to independently fitted their behavioural data. Alcohol use disorder and OCD patients showed less model‐based strategy choice than healthy controls in task conditions where the model‐based strategy was optimal. Only OCD patients showed higher behavioural control system switching in task conditions where model‐free use was optimal. Major depressive disorder patients did not differ from the matched control in both. These findings suggest that dysfunction in arbitration control between dual systems may be the basis for diverse disorders involving compulsivity.