Affiliation:
1. Université libre de Bruxelles Solvay Brussels School of Economics and Management Brussels Belgium
Abstract
AbstractHow do expectations for novel opportunities—like Amazon from the perspective of 1998—come about? To form such expectations, decision‐makers need to derive plausible conclusions that go beyond the available information by interpreting it with the help of theories. I explain why asymmetric expectations among rational individuals can exist, even when information is symmetric: Differences in the willingness to question of (defined as “a preference ordering over”) elementary theoretical explanations of the novelty bring about heterogeneity in final expectations. I further argue that one source of better expectations is the skill to choose the relative willingness to question beliefs and thus the skill to integrate theories. I identify the skills of decision‐makers to detect and resolve inconsistencies and to decide when to give up beliefs again as sources of advantages in forming expectations.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献