A critique of the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council CEO statement on electronic cigarettes

Author:

Mendelsohn Colin P.1ORCID,Hall Wayne2ORCID,Borland Ron3ORCID,Wodak Alex4ORCID,Beaglehole Robert5,Benowitz Neal L.6ORCID,Britton John7,Bullen Chris8,Etter Jean‐François9ORCID,McNeill Ann10ORCID,Rigotti Nancy A.11

Affiliation:

1. Unaffiliated Sydney Australia

2. National Centre for Youth Substance Use Research The University of Queensland St Lucia Queensland Australia

3. Melbourne Centre for Behaviour Change, School of Psychological Sciences The University of Melbourne Victoria Australia

4. Emeritus Consultant, Alcohol and Drug Service St Vincents’ Hospital Sydney Australia

5. University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand

6. Department of Medicine University of California San Francisco California USA

7. University of Nottingham Nottingham Nottinghamshire UK

8. School of Population Health The University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand

9. Institute of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine University of Geneva Geneva Switzerland

10. National Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London UK

11. Harvard Medical School, Director, Tobacco Research and Treatment Center Massachusetts General Hospital Massachusetts Boston USA

Abstract

AbstractThis paper critically analyses a statement by Australia's National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) on e‐cigarettes in May 2022 that will be used to guide national policy. We reviewed the evidence and the conclusions drawn in the NHMRC Statement. In our view, the Statement is not a balanced reflection of the benefits and risks of vaping because it exaggerates the risks of vaping and fails to compare them to the far greater risks of smoking; it uncritically accepts evidence of harms from e‐cigarettes while adopting a highly sceptical attitude towards evidence of their benefits; it incorrectly claims that the association between adolescent vaping and subsequent smoking is causal; and it understates the evidence of the benefits of e‐cigarettes in assisting smokers to quit. The Statement dismisses the evidence that vaping is probably already having a positive net public health effect and misapplies the precautionary principle. Several sources of evidence supporting our assessment were published after the NHMRC Statement's publication and are also referenced. The NHMRC Statement on e‐cigarettes does not present a balanced assessment of the available scientific literature and fails to meet the standard expected of a leading national scientific body.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference110 articles.

1. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). CEO Statement: Electronic Cigarettes. Canberra Australia: NHMRC; 2022. Available at:https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/health-advice/all-topics/electronic-cigarettes/ceo-statement(accessed 7 November 2020).

2. Royal College of Physicians (RCP). Nicotine Without Smoke: Tobacco Harm Reduction. London UK: RCP; 2016. Available at:https://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/projects/outputs/nicotine-without-smoke-tobacco-harm-reduction-0(accessed 7 November 2020).

3. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Tobacco: Preventing Uptake Promoting Quitting and Treating Dependence. 2021. Available at:www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng209(accessed 7 November 2020).

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3