Safety, feasibility, and neuromuscular activity of acute low‐load resistance exercise with or without blood flow restriction in patients with severe hemophilia

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo compare the safety, feasibility, and neuromuscular activity of acute low‐load resistance exercise with/without blood flow restriction (BFR) in people with severe hemophilia (PwH).MethodsEight PwH under prophylaxis (5 with resistance training experience) performed 6 randomly ordered conditions of 3 intensity‐matched knee extensions: no external load and no BFR, no external load and light BFR (20% of arterial occlusion pressure [AOP]), no external load and moderate BFR (40% AOP), external low load and no BFR, external low load with light BFR, and external low load with moderate BFR. Rated perceived exertion, pain, exercise tolerability, and adverse effects were assessed. Normalized root‐mean‐square (nRMS), nRMS spatial distribution, and muscle fiber‐conduction velocity (MFCV) were determined using high‐density surface electromyography for the vastus medialis and lateralis.ResultsExercises were tolerated, without pain increases or adverse events. Externally resisted conditions with/without BFR provided greater nRMS than nonexternally resisted conditions (p < 0.05). Spatial distribution and MFCV did not vary between conditions.ConclusionsIn these patients, knee extensions with low external resistance and BFR at 20% or 40% AOP appear safe, feasible and do not cause acute/delayed pain. However, BFR during three consecutive repetitions does not increase nRMS nor changes nRMS spatial distribution or MFCV.