Stereoelectroencephalography‐guided radiofrequency ablation of the epileptogenic zone as a treatment and predictor of future success of further surgical intervention

Author:

Shields Jessica A.1ORCID,Greven Alex C. M.1,Shivamurthy Veeresh K. N.2,Dickey Adam S.3ORCID,Matthews Rebecca E.3,Laxpati Neal G.1,Alwaki Abdulrahman3,Drane Daniel L.3ORCID,Isbaine Faical1,Willie Jon T.4ORCID,Bullinger Katie L.3ORCID,Gross Robert E.13ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurosurgery Emory University Atlanta Georgia USA

2. Department of Neurology Trinity Health of New England Hartford Connecticut USA

3. Department of Neurology Emory University Atlanta Georgia USA

4. Department of Neurosurgery Washington University St. Louis Missouri USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveStereoelectroencephalography (SEEG)‐guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is increasingly being used as a treatment for drug‐resistant localization‐related epilepsy. The aim of this study is to analyze the successes and failures using RFA and how response correlates with surgical epilepsy treatment outcomes.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 62 patients who underwent RFA via SEEG electrodes. After excluding five, the remaining 57 were classified into subgroups based on procedures and outcomes. Forty patients (70%) underwent a secondary surgical procedure, of whom 32 were delayed: 26 laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT), five resection, one neuromodulation. We determined the predictive value of RFA outcome upon subsequent surgical outcome by categorizing the delayed secondary surgery outcome as success (Engel I/II) versus failure (Engel III/IV). Demographic information, epilepsy characteristics, and the transient time of seizure freedom after RFA were calculated for each patient.ResultsTwelve of 49 patients (24.5%) who had RFA alone and delayed follow‐up achieved Engel class I. Of the 32 patients who underwent a delayed secondary surgical procedure, 15 achieved Engel class I and nine Engel class II (24 successes), and eight were considered failures (Engel class III/IV). The transient time of seizure freedom after RFA was significantly longer in the success group (4 months, SD = 2.6) as compared to the failure group (.75 months, SD = 1.16; p < .001). Additionally, there was a higher portion of preoperative lesional findings in patients in the RFA alone and delayed surgical success group (p = .03) and a longer time to seizure recurrence in the presence of lesions (p < .05). Side effects occurred in 1% of patients.SignificanceIn this series, RFA provided a treatment during SEEG‐guided intracranial monitoring that led to seizure freedom in ~25% of patients. Of the 70% who underwent delayed surgery, longer transient time of seizure freedom after RFA was predictive of the results of the secondary surgeries, 74% of which were LITT.

Funder

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Neurology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3