How strong is the evidence supporting the WHO guidelines on physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep in early childhood?

Author:

Bianconi Alessandro1ORCID,Fiore Matteo1,Zauli Enrico2,Acuti Martellucci Cecilia3,Rosso Annalisa4,Dallolio Laura1,Flacco Maria Elena4,Manzoli Lamberto1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Section of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine University of Bologna Bologna Italy

2. Department of Medical Translation University of Ferrara Ferrara Italy

3. Local Health Authority of Macerata Macerata Italy

4. Department of Environmental and Prevention Sciences University of Ferrara Ferrara Italy

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe WHO issued recommendations about the ideal amount of physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep in infants, toddlers and preschool children. To facilitate their interpretation and translation into public health policies, we analysed the quantity and quality of the evidence that supported the development of each WHO recommendation.MethodsAll data for each exposure‐outcome pair analysed in the studies informing WHO guidelines were extracted, and predefined criteria, based upon GRADE methodology, were used to classify each outcome and study result.ResultsAmong the 237 studies that could be included, 37 were experimental and 200 were observational, yielding 920 analyses of exposure‐outcome associations. Sixty‐two analyses used a relevant outcome, with or without significant results. Five of the 10 WHO recommendations were based upon zero analyses with significant results on relevant health outcomes. The remaining recommendations were mostly based upon analyses evaluating obesity‐related outcomes. Eight of the 10 GLs thresholds were not supported by any significant analysis on clinically relevant outcomes.ConclusionWhile these findings should not be interpreted as an attempt to disprove the benefits of healthy lifestyle habits in early childhood, neither to minimize the work of the experts in this complex research field, very limited evidence currently supports the adoption of recommended thresholds as behavioural surveillance and public health interventions targets. Therefore, until further data are available, public health interventions should be developed balancing whether to focus on the achievement of specific targets that are still not supported by high‐quality evidence or on the general promotion of healthy behaviours.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference38 articles.

1. Evaluation of evidence supporting NICE recommendations to change people's lifestyle in clinical practice: cross sectional survey;Albarqouni L;BMJ Medicine,2022

2. NICE.Overview | weight management: lifestyle services for overweight or obese children and young people | Guidance | NICE.2013. Available from:https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ph47

3. 2021 Dietary Guidance to Improve Cardiovascular Health: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3