Affiliation:
1. Department of Environmental and Biological Sciences University of Eastern Finland Kuopio Finland
2. Terrestrial Ecology Section, Department of Biology University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Ø Denmark
3. Department of Biology, Center for Volatile Interactions (VOLT) University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Ø Denmark
4. Department of Technical Physics University of Eastern Finland Kuopio Finland
5. Natural Resources Institute Finland Suonenjoki Finland
Abstract
AbstractClimate change is exposing subarctic ecosystems to higher temperatures, increased nutrient availability, and increasing cloud cover. In this study, we assessed how these factors affect the fluxes of greenhouse gases (GHGs) (i.e., methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), and carbon dioxide (CO2)), and biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOCs) in a subarctic mesic heath subjected to 34 years of climate change related manipulations of temperature, nutrient availability, and light. GHGs were sampled from static chambers and gases analyzed with gas chromatograph. BVOCs were measured using the push‐pull method and gases analyzed with chromatography–mass spectrometry. The soil temperature and moisture content in the warmed and shaded plots did not differ significantly from that in the controls during GHG and BVOC measurements. Also, the enclosure temperatures during BVOC measurements in the warmed and shaded plots did not differ significantly from temperatures in the controls. Hence, this allowed for assessment of long‐term effects of the climate treatment manipulations without interference of temperature and moisture differences at the time of measurements. Warming enhanced CH4 uptake and the emissions of CO2, N2O, and isoprene. Increased nutrient availability increased the emissions of CO2 and N2O but caused no significant changes in the fluxes of CH4 and BVOCs. Shading (simulating increased cloudiness) enhanced CH4 uptake but caused no significant changes in the fluxes of other gases compared to the controls. The results show that climate warming and increased cloudiness will enhance CH4 sink strength of subarctic mesic heath ecosystems, providing negative climate feedback, while climate warming and enhanced nutrient availability will provide positive climate feedback through increased emissions of CO2 and N2O. Climate warming will also indirectly, through vegetation changes, increase the amount of carbon lost as isoprene from subarctic ecosystems.
Reference87 articles.
1. Abisko Scientific Research Station. (2022).Meteorological data June 1–September 30 2022 temperature and precipitation data 1991–2020 Abisko Scientific Research Station Polarforskningssekretariatet.http://www.polar.se/abisko
2. Interactions between physical and biotic factors influence CO2 flux in Antarctic dry valley soils
3. Nitrous oxide emissions from soils: how well do we understand the processes and their controls?