Importer market power and preferential trade agreements: Empirical evidence

Author:

Jestrab Ross1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Research Division, Office of Economics U.S. International Trade Commission Washington USA

Abstract

AbstractThis paper provides direct empirical evidence that preferential trade agreements (PTAs) are consistent with the terms‐of‐trade theory. Using PTAs that occur between 2001 and 2015, we first show a PTA is associated with being more likely if countries have greater importer market power over one another. Second, using recently available tariff data for 39 bilateral PTAs, we show high levels of importer market power lead to tariff cuts that are larger in magnitude when PTAs enter into force. These results provide a rationale for why PTAs are permitted by the World Trade Organization.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Development,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference54 articles.

1. Global value chains and product differentiation: Changing the politics of trade;Baccini L.;Global Policy,2018

2. Intra‐industry trade, global value chains, and preferential tariff liberalization;Baccini L.;International Studies Quarterly,2018

3. Is the WTO passé?;Bagwell K.;Journal of Economic Literature,2016

4. An economic theory of GATT;Bagwell K.;American Economic Review,1999

5. What do trade negotiators negotiate about? Empirical evidence from the world trade organization;Bagwell K.;American Economic Review,2011

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3