The value‐based healthcare approach to haemophilia: Development of outcome measures for the evaluation of care of people with haemophilia

Author:

Cortesi Paolo Angelo1ORCID,Fornari Carla1ORCID,Conti Sara1ORCID,Pollio Berardino2,Boccalandro Elena3,Buzzi Andrea4,Carulli Christian5ORCID,Coppola Antonio6ORCID,De Cristofaro Raimondo7,Di Minno Matteo Nicola Dario8,Dolan Gerard9,Ferri Grazzi Enrico10,Fornari Arianna111,Gualtierotti Roberta312ORCID,Hermans Cedric13,Jiménez‐Juste Victor14ORCID,Kenet Gili15ORCID,Lupi Angelo10,Martinoli Carlo1617,Mansueto Maria Francesca18,Nicolò Gabriella19,Tagliaferri Annarita6,Gringeri Alessandro2021,Molinari Angelo Claudio22ORCID,Mantovani Lorenzo Giovanni12023,Castaman Giancarlo24ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Research Centre on Public Health (CESP) University of Milano‐Bicocca Monza Italy

2. Regional Reference Centre for Inherited Bleeding and Thrombotic Disorders, Transfusion Medicine “Regina Margherita” Children Hospital Turin Italy

3. Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Angelo Bianchi Bonomi Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center Milan Italy

4. Fondazione Paracelso Milan Italy

5. Orthopaedic Clinic University of Florence Florence Italy

6. Regional Reference Centre for Inherited Bleeding Disorders University Hospital of Parma Parma Italy

7. Haemorrhagic and Thrombotic Disease Service Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS Rome Italy

8. Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery Regional Reference Center for Coagulation Disorders Federico II University Naples Italy

9. Guys' and St Thomas' NHS Trust London UK

10. Federation of Haemophilia Associations (FedEmo) Milan Italy

11. Neurology, Public Health and Disability Unit Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta Milan Italy

12. Università degli Studi di Milano Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation Milan Italy

13. Haemostasis and Thrombosis Unit, Division of Haematology Cliniques Universitaires Saint‐Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain) Brussels Belgium

14. Thrombosis and Haemostasis Unit ‐ IdiPAZ University Hospital La Paz Madrid Spain

15. National Hemophilia Center Thrombosis Unit and Amalia Biron Research Institute of Thrombosis and Hemostasis Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv Israel

16. Department of Health Science ‐ DISSAL University of Genoa Genoa Italy

17. IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino Genoa Italy

18. Division of Hematology University Hospital Paolo Giaccone Palermo Italy

19. Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano Department of Healthcare Professions Milan Italy

20. CHARTA Foundation Milan Italy

21. Solidarity Health Care Center Lucca Italy

22. Regional Reference Centre for Haemorrhagic Diseases IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini Genova Italy

23. IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano Milan Italy

24. Department of Oncology Centre for Bleeding Disorders and Coagulation Careggi University Hospital Florence Italy

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionConsidering the advances in haemophilia management and treatment observed in the last decades, a new set of value‐based outcome indicators is needed to assess the quality of care and the impact of these medical innovations.AimThe Value‐Based Healthcare in Haemophilia project aimed to define a set of clinical outcome indicators (COIs) and patient‐reported outcome indicators (PROIs) to assess quality of care in haemophilia in high‐income countries with a value‐based approach to inform and guide the decision‐making process.MethodsA Value‐based healthcare approach based on the available literature, current guidelines and the involvement of a multidisciplinary group of experts was applied to generate a set of indicators to assess the quality of care of haemophilia.ResultsA final list of three COIs and five PROIs was created and validated. The identified COIs focus on two domains: musculoskeletal health and function, and safety. The identified PROIs cover five domains: bleeding frequency, pain, mobility and physical activities, Health‐Related Quality of Life and satisfaction. Finally, two composite outcomes, one based on COIs, and one based on PROIs, were proposed as synthetic outcome indicators of quality of care.ConclusionThe presented standard set of health outcome indicators provides the basis for harmonised longitudinal and cross‐sectional monitoring and comparison. The implementation of this value‐based approach would enable a more robust assessment of quality of care in haemophilia, within a framework of continuous treatment improvements with potential added value for patients. Moreover, proposed COIs and PROIs should be reviewed and updated routinely.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Outcome measures in hemophilia: current and future perspectives;Expert Review of Hematology;2024-06-19

2. Outcomes and outcome measures;Haemophilia;2024-03-19

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3