Using a footstool does not aid simulated defecation in undifferentiated constipation: A randomized trial

Author:

Trieu Rose Qizhengyan12ORCID,Prott Gillian1,Sequeira Carol1,Jones Michael3ORCID,Mazor Yoav45ORCID,Schnitzler Margaret26,Malcolm Allison1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Neurogastroenterology Unit and Department of Gastroenterology Royal North Shore Hospital St Leonards New South Wales Australia

2. The University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia

3. Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences Macquarie University Sydney New South Wales Australia

4. Neurogastroenterology Unit and Department of Gastroenterology Rambam Health Care Campus Haifa Israel

5. Department of Medical Neurobiology The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Jerusalem Israel

6. Department of Colorectal Surgery Royal North Shore Hospital St Leonards New South Wales Australia

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionThe use of a footstool has been advocated to optimize posture when sitting on the toilet and thus facilitate bowel evacuation. We aimed to assess the alterations in defecatory posture, and the changes in simulated defecation with use of a footstool in patients with constipation.MethodsForty‐one patients (female 93%, mean 52 year, SD 14 year) with constipation referred to a tertiary neurogastroenterology unit were enrolled. A bowel questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and Rome questionnaire were administered prior to anorectal manometry. Each patient underwent three rectal balloon expulsion tests in randomized order with no footstool, a 7‐inch, and a 9‐inch footstool. Additional assessments included angle between spine and femur, and visual analogue scales assessing ease of evacuation, urge to defecate, and discomfort with expulsion.Key ResultsDefecatory posture was significantly altered by footstool use, with progressive narrowing of the angle between the spine and femur as footstool height increased (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). Compared with no footstool, the use of a footstool was not associated with a change in balloon expulsion time and there was no difference between the two footstool heights. Subjectively, no significant change was identified in any of the three perceptions of balloon expulsion between no footstool and footstool use.Conclusions and InferencesAlthough the use of a footstool led to changes in defecatory posture, it did not improve subjective or objective measures of simulated defecation in patients with undifferentiated constipation. Therefore, the recommendation for its use during evacuation cannot be applied to all patients with constipation.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Gastroenterology,Endocrine and Autonomic Systems,Physiology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3