Nordic survey showed wide variation in discharge practices for very preterm infants

Author:

Arwehed Sofia1ORCID,Axelin Anna12,Björklund Lars J.3,Thernström Blomqvist Ylva1,Heiring Christian4,Jonsson Baldvin5,Klingenberg Claus67ORCID,Metsäranta Marjo8,Ågren Johan1ORCID,Lehtonen Liisa9

Affiliation:

1. Department of Women's and Children's Health Uppsala University and Uppsala University Hospital Uppsala Sweden

2. Department of Nursing Science University of Turku Turku Finland

3. Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund, Paediatrics Lund University and Skåne University Hospital Lund Sweden

4. Department of Neonatology Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet Denmark

5. Department of Women's and Children's Health Karolinska Institute and Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm Sweden

6. Paediatric Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences UiT‐The Arctic University of Norway Tromsø Norway

7. Department of Pediatrics and Adolescence Medicine University Hospital of North Norway Tromsø Norway

8. Department of Pediatrics University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital (HUH) Helsinki Finland

9. Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine Turku University, Hospital and University of Turku Turku Finland

Abstract

AbstractAimWe aimed to describe clinical practices and criteria for discharge of very preterm infants in Nordic neonatal units.MethodsMedical directors of all 89 level‐2 and level‐3 units in Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden were invited by e‐mail to complete a web‐based multiple‐choice survey with the option to make additional free‐text comments.ResultsWe received responses from 83/89 units (93%). In all responding units, discharge readiness was based mainly on clinical assessment with varying criteria. In addition, 36% used formal tests of cardiorespiratory stability and 59% used criteria related to infant weight or growth. For discharge with feeding tube, parental ability to speak the national language or English was mandatory in 45% of units, with large variation among countries. Post‐discharge home visits and video‐consultations were provided by 59% and 51%, respectively. In 54% of units, parental preparation for discharge were not initiated until the last two weeks of hospital stay.ConclusionDischarge readiness was based mainly on clinical assessment, with criteria varying among units despite similar population characteristics and care structures. This variation indicates a lack of evidence base and may unnecessarily delay discharge; further studies of this matter are needed. Earlier parental preparation and use of interpreters might facilitate earlier discharge.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Issue highlights;Acta Paediatrica;2023-12-08

2. How do we discharge preterm infants safely without unnecessary delay?;Acta Paediatrica;2023-10-29

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3