Exploring the barriers, facilitators and needs to use patient outcomes in district nursing care: A multi‐method qualitative study

Author:

Veldhuizen Jessica Desirée1ORCID,Van Wijngaarden Frans2ORCID,Mikkers Misja Chiljon3ORCID,Schuurmans Marieke Joanne4,Bleijenberg Nienke15ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Research Group Proactive Care for Older People Living at Home, Research Centre for Healthy and Sustainable Living University of Applied Sciences Utrecht Utrecht The Netherlands

2. District Nursing Care Organisation Viva! Zorggroep Velsen‐Noord The Netherlands

3. Dutch Healthcare Authority, Department of Economics Tilburg School of Economics and Management Tilburg The Netherlands

4. Dutch Healthcare Authority, Department of General Practice & Nursing Science, Division Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht The Netherlands

5. Department of General Practice & Nursing Science, Division Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht The Netherlands

Abstract

AbstractAim and ObjectivesTo provide an in‐depth insight into the barriers, facilitators and needs of district nurses and nurse assistants on using patient outcomes in district nursing care.BackgroundAs healthcare demands grow, particularly in district nursing, there is a significant need to understand how to systematically measure and improve patient outcomes in this setting. Further investigation is needed to identify the barriers and facilitators for effective implementation.DesignA multi‐method qualitative study.MethodsOpen‐ended questions of a survey study (N = 132) were supplemented with in‐depth online focus group interviews involving district nurses and nurse assistants (N = 26) in the Netherlands. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.ResultsDifferent barriers, facilitators and needs were identified and compiled into 16 preconditions for using outcomes in district nursing care. These preconditions were summarised into six overarching themes: follow the steps of a learning healthcare system; provide patient‐centred care; promote the professional's autonomy, attitude, knowledge and skills; enhance shared responsibility and collaborations within and outside organisational boundaries; prioritise and invest in the use of outcomes; and boost the unity and appreciation for district nursing care.ConclusionsThe preconditions identified in this study are crucial for nurses, care providers, policymakers and payers in implementing the use of patient outcomes in district nursing practice. Further exploration of appropriate strategies is necessary for a successful implementation.Relevance to clinical practiceThis study represents a significant step towards implementing the use of patient outcomes in district nursing care. While most research has focused on hospitals and general practitioner settings, this study focuses on the needs for district nursing care. By identifying 16 key preconditions across themes such as patient‐centred care, professional autonomy and unity, the findings offer valuable guidance for integrating a learning healthcare system that prioritises the measurement and continuous improvement of patient outcomes in district nursing.Reporting MethodConsolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) guidelines.Patient of Public ContributionNo patient or public contribution.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference39 articles.

1. Berwick D. Black N. Cullen D. Deerberg‐Wittram J. Degos L. Diverty B. Epstein A. Kieny M. Larsen B. &Schneider E.(2017).Recommendations to OECD ministers of health from the high level reflection group on the future of health statistics: Strengthening the international comparison of health system performance through patient‐reported indicators. Statistics.

2. Kennisagenda wijkverpleging: een routeplanner voor de toekomst!

3. Using thematic analysis in psychology

4. Thematic analysis.

5. The Learning Healthcare System: Where are we now? A systematic review

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3