A comparative evaluation of three consecutive artificial intelligence algorithms released by Techcyte for identification of blasts and white blood cells in abnormal peripheral blood films

Author:

Lincz Lisa F.123ORCID,Makhija Karan13ORCID,Attalla Khaled34,Scorgie Fiona E.13ORCID,Enjeti Anoop K.1345ORCID,Prasad Ritam34

Affiliation:

1. Haematology Department Calvary Mater Newcastle Waratah New South Wales Australia

2. School of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing University of Newcastle Callaghan New South Wales Australia

3. Precision Medicine Research Program Hunter Medical Research Institute New Lambton New South Wales Australia

4. New South Wales Health Pathology John Hunter Hospital New Lambton New South Wales Australia

5. School of Medicine and Public Health College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionDigital pathology artificial intelligence (AI) platforms have the capacity to improve over time through “deep machine learning.” We have previously reported on the accuracy of peripheral white blood cell (WBC) differential and blast identification by Techcyte (Techcyte, Inc., Orem, UT, USA), a digital scanner‐agnostic web‐based system for blood film reporting. The aim of the current study was to compare AI protocols released over time to assess improvement in cell identification.MethodsWBC differentials were performed using Techcyte's online AI software on the same 124 digitized abnormal peripheral blood films (including 64 acute and 22 chronic leukaemias) in 2019 (AI1), 2020 (AI2), and 2022 (AI3), with no reassignment by a morphologist at any time point. AI results were correlated to the “gold standard” of manual microscopy, and comparison of Lin's concordance coefficients (LCC) and sensitivity and specificity of blast identification were used to determine the superior AI version.ResultsAI correlations (r) with manual microscopy for individual cell types ranged from 0.50–0.90 (AI1), 0.66–0.86 (AI2) and 0.71–0.91 (AI3). AI3 concordance with manual microscopy was significantly improved compared to AI1 for identification of neutrophils (LCC AI3 = 0.86 vs. AI1 = 0.77, p = 0.03), total granulocytes (LCC AI3 = 0.92 vs. AI1 = 0.82, p = 0.0008), immature granulocytes (LCC AI3 = 0.67 vs. AI1 = 0.38, p = 0.0014), and promyelocytes (LCC AI3 = 0.53 vs. AI1 = 0.16, p = 0.0008). Sensitivity for blast identification (n = 65 slides) improved from 97% (AI1), to 98% (AI2), to 100% (AI3), while blast specificity decreased from 24% (AI1), to 14% (AI2) to 12% (AI3).ConclusionTechcyte AI has shown significant improvement in cell identification over time and maintains high sensitivity for blast identification in malignant films.

Funder

Calvary Mater Newcastle

Hunter Medical Research Institute

NSW Health Pathology

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry,Hematology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3