Staged treatment response in status epilepticus: Lessons from the SENSE registry

Author:

Beuchat Isabelle1ORCID,Novy Jan1ORCID,Rosenow Felix23ORCID,Kellinghaus Christoph45,Rüegg Stephan6ORCID,Tilz Christian7,Trinka Eugen891011ORCID,Unterberger Iris12ORCID,Uzelac Zeljko13ORCID,Strzelczyk Adam2314ORCID,Rossetti Andrea O.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurology Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV) and University of Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland

2. Epilepsy Center Frankfurt Rhine‐Main and Department of Neurology Goethe‐University Frankfurt am Main Germany

3. LOEWE Center for Personalized Translational Epilepsy Research (CePTER) Goethe‐University Frankfurt am Main Germany

4. Department of Neurology Klinikum Osnabrück Osnabrück Germany

5. Epilepsy Center Münster‐Osnabrück, Campus Osnabrück Osnabrück Germany

6. Department of Neurology University Hospital Basel, and University of Basel Basel Switzerland

7. Department of Neurology Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder Regensburg Germany

8. Department of Neurology Christian Doppler University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Member of the European Reference Network EpiCARE Salzburg Austria

9. Neuroscience Institute, Christian Doppler University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience Salzburg Austria

10. Department of Public Health Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT – University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology Hall in Tirol Austria

11. Karl Landsteiner Institute for Neurorehabilitation and Space Neurology Salzburg Austria

12. Department of Neurology Innsbruck Medical University Innsbruck Austria

13. Department of Neurology University Hospital Ulm Ulm Germany

14. Epilepsy Center Hessen and Department of Neurology Philipps‐University Marburg Marburg Germany

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesAlthough in epilepsy patients the likelihood of becoming seizure‐free decreases substantially with each unsuccessful treatment, to our knowledge this has been poorly investigated in status epilepticus (SE). We aimed to evaluate the proportion of SE cessation and functional outcome after successive treatment steps.MethodsWe conducted a post hoc analysis of a prospective, observational, multicenter cohort (Sustained Effort Network for treatment of Status Epilepticus [SENSE]), in which 1049 incident adult SE episodes were prospectively recorded at nine European centers. We analyzed 996 SE episodes without coma induction before the third treatment step. Rates of SE cessation, mortality (in ongoing SE or after SE control), and favorable functional outcome (assessed with modified Rankin scale) were evaluated after each step.ResultsSE was treated successfully in 838 patients (84.1%), 147 (14.8%) had a fatal outcome (36% of them died while still in SE), and 11 patients were transferred to palliative care while still in SE. Patients were treated with a median of three treatment steps (range 1–13), with 540 (54.2%) receiving more than two steps (refractory SE [RSE]) and 95 (9.5%) more than five steps. SE was controlled after the first two steps in 45%, with an additional 21% treated after the third, and 14% after the fourth step. Likelihood of SE cessation (p < 0.001), survival (p = 0.003), and reaching good functional outcome (p < 0.001) decreased significantly between the first two treatment lines and the third, especially in patients not experiencing generalized convulsive SE, but remained relatively stable afterwards.SignificanceThe significant worsening of SE prognosis after the second step clinically supports the concept of RSE. However, and differing from findings in human epilepsy, RSE remains treatable in about one third of patients, even after several failed treatment steps. Clinical judgment remains essential to determine the aggressiveness and duration of SE treatment, and to avoid premature treatment cessation in patients with SE.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Neurology

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3