Prevalence of pressure ulcer and related factors in orthopaedic wards: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Asadi Kamran1ORCID,Fouladpour Amin1,Ghorbani Vajargah Pooyan23ORCID,Mollaei Amirabbas23ORCID,Firooz Mahbobeh4ORCID,Hosseini Seyed Javad4ORCID,Zaboli Mahdiabadi Morteza5,Samidoust Pirouz6ORCID,Takasi Poorya23ORCID,Karkhah Samad23ORCID,Salari Amir1ORCID,Aris Arash1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopedics, Orthopedic Research Center, Poorsina Hospital, Faculty of Medicine Guilan University of Medical Sciences Rasht Iran

2. Burn and Regenerative Medicine Research Center Guilan University of Medical Sciences Rasht Iran

3. Department of Medical‐Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery Guilan University of Medical Sciences Rasht Iran

4. Department of Nursing Esfarayen Faculty of Medical Sciences Esfarayen Iran

5. Student Research Committee Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences Yazd Iran

6. Razi Clinical Research Development Unit Razi Hospital, Guilan University of Medical Sciences Rasht Iran

Abstract

AbstractThe aim of this systematic review and meta‐analysis is to provide an overview of the prevalence of pressure ulcers (PU) in orthopaedic wards. A comprehensive, systematic search was conducted in different international electronic databases, such as Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Persian electronic databases such as Iranmedex, and Scientific Information Database (SID) using keywords extracted from Medical Subject Headings such as “Prevalence”, “Pressure ulcer”, “Pressure sore”, and “Orthopaedics” from the earliest to February 1, 2023. The appraisal tool for cross‐sectional studies (AXIS tool) evaluates the quality of the included studies. Finally, 11 studies were included in the final analysis. The results indicated that the prevalence of PU in orthopaedic departments was 18% (ES: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.10–0.26, Z = 4.53, I2: 99.09%). Although the odds ratio of PU was lower in men than women, it was not statistically significant (OR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.74–1.11, Z = 0.95, I2: 17.4%, P = .34). Also, results showed the prevalence of PU was higher among studies with a sample size of more than 200 (ES: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.10–0.28, Z = 4.07, I2: 99.1%), Europe region (ES: 0.20, 95% CI: 0.14–0.26, Z = 6.7, I2: 93.0%) and prospective design (ES: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.18–0.27, Z = 9.47, I2: 83.3%) when compared with other sub‐groups. In sum, considering the 18% prevalence of PU in the orthopaedic department, it is recommended to focus on detecting risk factors and design interventions to reduce PU in the patients admitted orthopaedic department.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Dermatology,Surgery

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3