“In the eye of the beholder”: pharmacy students have more positive perceptions of medicines than students of other disciplines

Author:

Horne Robert1,Frost Susie1,Hankins Matthew2,Wright Siobhan2

Affiliation:

1. Centre of Health Care Research, University of Brighton, Falmer Campus, Brighton, England BN1 9PH

2. School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Brighton

Abstract

Abstract Objective Exploratory study to examine whether pharmacy students differ significantly from students on other courses in their beliefs about medicines. Method Questionnaire study assessing beliefs about medicines in general and perceptions of personal sensitivity to the potential adverse effects of medication. Setting Undergraduate students sampled from each academic year of five degree courses. Five hundred and seventy completed questionnaires were analysed. Key findings The findings indicated significant differences between students on the basis of their chosen course. Pharmacy students were significantly more likely than engineering, accountancy, social policy, and humanities students to believe that medicines in general are beneficial, and were significantly less likely to perceive medicines as potentially harmful. Humanities students were more likely than most other groups to believe that medicines are over-prescribed by doctors. The observed relationship between course and medication beliefs remained statistically significant when controlling for ethnic background, experience of taking prescribed medication, and year of study. A further analysis revealed no significant effect of year of course on medication beliefs, and no significant interaction between course and year of study. Conclusion The findings suggest that students' attitudes were formed before they arrived at university, rather than being “shaped” by the course over a three-year period. The implications of these findings for patient-pharmacist communication are discussed.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,Pharmaceutical Science,Pharmacy

Reference9 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3