It's for your benefit: exploring patients' opinions about the inclusion of textual and numerical benefit information in medicine leaflets

Author:

Hamrosi Kim1,Dickinson Rebecca2,Knapp Peter3,Raynor David K2,Krass Ines1,Sowter Julie2,Aslani Parisa1

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

2. School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

3. Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK

Abstract

Abstract Objectives To explore consumers' beliefs and preferences for benefit information in medicine leaflets and examine their understanding and reaction to treatment benefits. Methods Forty-five participants were recruited to eight focus groups, run concurrently in Australia (23 participants in four groups) and the UK (22 participants in four groups). Participants were provided with amended leaflets based on the medicine clopidogrel, containing textual and numerical benefit information presented using numbers needed to treat (NNT). A topic guide which explored use of leaflets, preferences and opinions was used to direct discussion. Focus group discussions were recorded, transcribed verbatim and content analysed using adapted cross-case study analysis. Key findings The consensus was that the inclusion of benefit information was a positive factor. Many participants felt that textual benefit information offered an incentive to take a medicine, although some Australian participants had concerns that included benefit information could create anxiety. The presentation of numerical benefit information provoked strong feelings of disbelief and shock. Participants were surprised that so few people would benefit. Some participants struggled to understand and interpret the NNT and others found it difficult to comprehend the magnitude of the benefit information, instead operating on initial and often crude assumptions of what the data meant. In both countries the provision of numerical benefit information appeared to shake participants' faith in drug treatments. Participants were concerned about how this might affect the ‘less-informed’ patient. However, in the UK, participants stated that their adherence to treatment was also reinforced by their doctor's advice. Conclusions Participants wanted to receive information about the benefits of their medicines. However, they may misinterpret the numerical information provided.

Funder

WUN

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,Pharmaceutical Science,Pharmacy

Reference35 articles.

1. The benefits of prescription information leaflets (1);Gibbs;Br J Clin Pharmacol,1989

2. Effects of information leaflets on compliance with antibiotic therapy;Dodds;Pharm J,1986

3. A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative research on the role and effectiveness of written information available to patients about individual medicines;Raynor;Health Technol Assess,2007

4. Comparative evaluation of patient information leaflets by pharmacists, doctors and the general public;Mottram;J Clin Pharm Ther,1997

5. We are the experts: people with asthma talk about their medicine information needs;Raynor;Patient Educ Couns,2004

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3